Hedge Fund / Alternative Investment Manager

Perseverance Asset Management International

New York, NY SEC Registered Investment Advisor Institutional CIK: 0001802695
13F Score ?
8
3Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
13F Score ?
7Y · Top 10 · Mgr Wt
S&P 500 ?
80
Benchmark
$909M
AUM
+0.00%
2026 Q1
+21.82%
1-Year Return
+89.48%
Top 10 Concentration
+14.50%
Turnover
+33.18%
AUM Change
Since 2019
First Filing
21
# of Holdings

Fund Overview

13F Filed: 2026-05-14

As of 2026 Q1, Perseverance Asset Management International manages $909M in reported 13F assets , holds 21 positions with +89.48% top-10 concentration , and delivered a 1-year return of +21.82% on its disclosed equity portfolio. Filing 13F reports since 2019.

About

Investment Strategy

Analytics Summary

Key Personnel

Daniel Jacobs — Founder & Chief Investment Officer
Official 13F Filings — SEC EDGAR Key personnel and Fund Overview may contain mistakes

Activity Summary — 2026 Q1

Q1 2026 13F Filed: May 14, 2026

Top Buys

% $
Stock % Impact
+15.64%
+5.75%
+5.56%
+3.70%
+2.26%
+1.93%

Top Sells

% $
Stock % Impact
-7.20%
-5.29%
-0.72%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.75% -0.57%
Sold All 😨 Was: 0.42% -0.31%
-0.18%

Top Holdings

2026 Q1
Stock %
24.30%
21.48%
16.60%
6.32%
5.56%
3.83%
View All Holdings

Activity Summary

Latest
Market Value $909M
AUM Change +33.18%
New Positions 10
Increased Positions 5
Closed Positions 2
Top 10 Concentration +89.48%
Portfolio Turnover +14.50%
Alt Turnover +26.96%

Sector Allocation Trends

Quarterly History
Free View: Last 10 Quarters. Subscribe to see full history

Holdings Analysis

Size: % of Portfolio Color: Last Full-Quarter Return No data
Free: 10 quarters

Positions Dynamics

Visualizing Top 20 holdings weight history over the last 10 quarters.

Portfolio Analytics — Latest

Perseverance Asset Management International risk dashboard covering volatility, beta, value-at-risk, drawdowns, concentration, factor tilts, benchmark comparison, and stress testing for the latest disclosed portfolio.

Risk access
Building institutional risk profile...
Guru Intelligence Hub Pro
Real-time Analytics
High-Conviction Alpha
AAPL 92.4
NVDA 88.1
MSFT 74.3
Strategy Guardian
Style Drift 0.12
Sector Rotation 0.38

Tracking institutional benchmark deviation

Scenario Lab
2008 GFC -32.4%
Covid-19 -18.1%
2022 Bear -24.7%
Unlock the full Guru Intelligence Hub
Real conviction scores for every holding  ·  Strategy Guardian alerts  ·  Live Scenario Lab stress tests
Upgrade to Pro

Best Strategy vs. Benchmarks

AI Backtest: Auto-Optimizing...
Loading AI Backtest...
Don't be Fooled by Randomness
Access Alpha, Capture Ratios, and Batting Average calibrated for this specific strategy.
UPGRADE NOW
Nassim Taleb — author of Fooled by Randomness
Returns
--
Latest Quarter
--
1-Year Return
--
Ann. Return
Risk
--
Std Deviation
--
Max Drawdown
--
Beta vs SPY
Quality
--
Sharpe
--
Sortino
--
Win Rate
--
Payoff Ratio
Edge Metrics Last 10 quarters only
--
Alpha annualized
--
Up Capture
--
Down Capture

Strategy Backtester: Perseverance Asset Management International

Replicate top holdings performance • Compare vs benchmarks • Optimize N

Find the best N! Test multiple portfolio sizes at once to discover the optimal configuration.

Risk insights! Identify periods when the fund lagged the benchmark – critical for timing entries.

⏱ Run Backtest

Liquid Glass Edition

0
Backtests Run
+127%
Avg. Return

👆 Click the button to launch tickers!

Don't Be Fooled by Randomness
Proven alpha spans cycles, not just 24 months. Unlock full history since 1999.
PRO ACCESS
Free Demo
Try the Backtester on Real Funds
Run full-history backtests on a curated 2-3 funds. See signal quality, drawdowns, and cycle behavior before you decide.
Underperformance Analysis — Top 10 Holdings vs SPY

Backtesting Perseverance Asset Management International's top 10 holdings against SPY identified 18 underperformance periods. Worst drawdown: 2021-02 – 2021-04 (-37.9% vs SPY, 3 quarters). Currently underperforming.

Avg. lag: -19.5% vs SPY Avg. duration: 2.4 quarters
Backtest Snapshot — Top 10 Holdings (Mn-Weighted)

The ticker-level breakdown shows how each of Perseverance Asset Management International's top holdings contributed to portfolio returns quarter by quarter. Strongest recent contributors inside the last 5 years of the quarterly Top 10 backtest window: HTHT (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +17.0 pts), PDD (2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4, +16.1 pts), TAL (2021 Q2 – 2023 Q4, +7.7 pts), EDU (2022 Q2 – 2023 Q3, +7.3 pts), GOOG (2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4, +5.3 pts) .

Strategy ann.: -4.6% SPY ann.: 15.6% Period: 2020–2026
Best Recent Contributors — Last 5Y
2 of 5 recent top contributors lagged SPY, which means even some of this fund's best return drivers still failed to beat a simple index over the same window.
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 12Q in Top 10 Lagged SPY
HTHT
+33%
SPY
+70%
Contrib
+17.0%
2021 Q2 – 2025 Q4 • 19Q in Top 10 Lagged SPY
PDD
+21%
SPY
+79%
Contrib
+16.1%
2021 Q2 – 2023 Q4 • 7Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
TAL
+114%
SPY
+42%
Contrib
+7.7%
2022 Q2 – 2023 Q3 • 6Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
EDU
+252%
SPY
+19%
Contrib
+7.3%
2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 • 4Q in Top 10 Beat SPY
GOOG
+75%
SPY
+13%
Contrib
+5.3%
Stock return (green = beat SPY)   Stock return (red = lagged SPY)   SPY same period   Cumulative contribution during the last 5 years of the quarterly Mn-weighted Top 10 strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Perseverance Asset Management International invest in?
Perseverance Asset Management International employs a fundamentally driven equity strategy that combines rigorous bottom-up security analysis with an awareness of catalysts and inflection points that can unlock embedded value within individual holdings. The firm's **13F Portfolio Composition** reveals a concentrated equity portfolio that reflects high-conviction research theses rather than broad-based market exposure — a defining characteristic of alternative investment mandates that seek differentiated alpha generation rather than benchmark approximation. The observable investment approach demonstrates particular affinity for technology and healthcare sectors, two domains that offer the combination of secular growth dynamics, intellectual property-driven competitive advantages, and frequent corporate catalysts — product launches, clinical trial readouts, regulatory milestones, strategic transactions — that create asymmetric return opportunities for well-researched investors. Beyond these core sector concentrations, the portfolio periodically features special situations and opportunistic positions across other sectors where the firm identifies mispriced securities undergoing identifiable operational, financial, or strategic transitions. Position sizing reflects the firm's conviction-driven philosophy. The **Top 10 Holdings Concentration** across disclosed filings is characteristically elevated, indicating a willingness to deploy meaningful capital behind the firm's highest-conviction ideas. This concentration discipline requires deep fundamental knowledge of each portfolio company — including competitive positioning, management quality, financial structure, and catalyst timeline — to justify the associated position-level risk. The approach stands in deliberate contrast to diversified strategies where position sizes are constrained by tracking error budgets or risk-parity frameworks. The firm's investment style spans the growth-to-GARP (Growth at a Reasonable Price) spectrum, targeting companies where fundamental quality and earnings trajectory justify current valuations or where temporary dislocations have created entry points below intrinsic value estimates. This hybrid orientation allows the portfolio to participate in secular growth themes while maintaining valuation discipline that provides a margin of safety — a particularly valuable attribute during periods of multiple compression such as the 2022 rate-driven correction. Turnover falls in the moderate to high range, reflecting the natural lifecycle of catalyst-driven positions. The **Sector Allocation History** shows meaningful evolution over the filing period, with sector weights shifting as the firm deploys capital toward emerging opportunity sets and harvests returns from positions where catalysts have been realized. This dynamic allocation behavior distinguishes Perseverance from static allocation models and reflects an actively managed portfolio where every position must continuously earn its place in the portfolio through ongoing fundamental assessment. The 13F disclosures capture only the firm's long equity positions, and as a hedge fund structure, the total portfolio likely includes short positions, hedging instruments, and potentially options or other derivatives that are not visible in 13F filings. The disclosed long portfolio therefore represents one dimension of what is likely a more complex, multi-leg investment strategy. This limitation is important context for researchers analyzing the 13F data, as the disclosed positions alone may not fully capture the firm's actual net exposure, risk posture, or return generation mechanics. INVESTMENT RISK PROFILE The risk characteristics of Perseverance Asset Management International's disclosed portfolio reflect the concentrated, conviction-driven approach that defines the firm's investment mandate. Several distinct risk dimensions emerge from analysis of the firm's filing history, creating a profile that diverges meaningfully from diversified long-only benchmarks. Concentration risk is the portfolio's most prominent structural characteristic. With significant capital allocated to a limited number of high-conviction positions, the portfolio's capital trajectory is heavily influenced by position-level outcomes. This concentration amplifies both the upside potential and the drawdown severity relative to broadly diversified strategies. The **Volatility Profile** of the disclosed long portfolio would be expected to exceed broad equity benchmarks, with realized volatility driven by both market-level movements and the idiosyncratic behavior of concentrated positions around company-specific events. Sector concentration introduces an additional risk layer. The portfolio's emphasis on technology and healthcare — while providing access to high-growth, high-innovation opportunity sets — creates correlation within the portfolio that can amplify drawdowns during sector-specific dislocations. Technology stocks experienced severe multiple compression during the 2022 rate-hiking cycle, while healthcare and biotech names are subject to binary regulatory and clinical outcomes that can produce discontinuous price movements. The degree to which the firm manages this sector concentration through hedging, position sizing constraints, or offsetting short positions (not visible in 13F filings) is a critical but partially unobservable risk management dimension. The **Max Drawdown Depth** during realized stress events represents a central risk metric for concentrated alternative strategies. The firm's filing history encompasses the sharp but brief COVID-19 crash of March 2020 and the more sustained 2022 bear market — two qualitatively different stress environments that test different aspects of portfolio resilience. The rapid V-shaped recovery of 2020 rewarded concentrated growth exposure, while the prolonged 2022 selloff punished precisely the growth and technology names that Perseverance tends to favor. The portfolio's behavior across these contrasting stress events — observable through quarterly filing analysis and historical replication — provides critical diagnostic information about the strategy's drawdown characteristics and recovery mechanics. Catalyst risk — the possibility that anticipated company-specific events fail to materialize, are delayed, or produce unexpected outcomes — is an inherent feature of the firm's fundamental, event-aware approach. Concentrated positions sized around specific catalysts are exposed to binary outcome scenarios where thesis invalidation can result in meaningful capital impairment before positions can be exited. The firm's management of this catalyst dependency — through position sizing discipline, stop-loss frameworks, or hedging overlays — determines whether concentrated exposure translates into persistent alpha or episodic large losses. The partial observability limitation of 13F disclosures is particularly relevant for Perseverance. As a hedge fund structure, the firm's actual net market exposure, short positioning, and hedging activity are not captured in the 13F long portfolio. The disclosed positions may therefore overstate the portfolio's actual directional risk if significant short or hedge positions offset the concentrated long exposure. Portfolio simulation and backtesting tools applied to the disclosed long positions can quantify the risk characteristics of the visible portfolio component, but researchers should interpret results with the understanding that the total portfolio risk profile may differ materially.
What is Perseverance Asset Management International's AUM?
Perseverance Asset Management International reported $909M in 13F assets as of 2026 Q1. Note: 13F AUM reflects only long equity positions reported to the SEC and may differ from total assets under management.
How concentrated is Perseverance Asset Management International's portfolio?
Perseverance Asset Management International holds 21 disclosed positions. The top 10 holdings represent +89.48% of the reported portfolio, indicating a highly concentrated investment approach.
How to track Perseverance Asset Management International 13F filings?
Track Perseverance Asset Management International's quarterly filings on SEC EDGAR or on this page — data is updated within days of each filing deadline. Subscribe to 13Foresight for position-change alerts.
Who manages Perseverance Asset Management International?
Perseverance Asset Management International is managed by Daniel Jacobs (Founder & Chief Investment Officer).

Disclaimer: 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. All information on this site is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Portfolio backtests shown on this page are hypothetical and simulated — they do not represent actual trading results and were constructed with the benefit of hindsight. Actual results would differ materially. 13F filings disclose only long equity positions valued above $10,000, submitted up to 45 days after quarter-end; they do not capture short positions, options, bonds, cash, private investments, or non-U.S. securities. A fund's backtest performance may not reflect its actual returns, as managers frequently generate alpha through strategies not visible in 13F data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All data sourced from public SEC EDGAR filings. Use at your own risk. Full Terms of Use.

Full history →