Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

ALUMIS INC COM (ALMS)

136 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ALMS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +5
Streak
7Q ▲
Buyers last Q
58%

Smart Money Signals — ALMS

Based on 130 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 7 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 7 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ALMS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
130 hedge funds hold ALMS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +106% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+67 new funds entered over the past year (+106% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 58% buying

80 buying59 selling
Last quarter: 80 funds bought or added vs 59 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~30 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 18 → 53 → 31 → 30. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 48% entered in last year

■ 6% conviction (2yr+) ■ 45% medium ■ 48% new
Only 8 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -0%, value -99%

Value
-98%
Shares
0%
Last quarter: funds added -0% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -99%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~30 new funds/quarter

16 → 18 → 53 → 31 → 30 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 18 → 53 → 31 → 30. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🌱

Early stage — 60% of holders entered in last year

■ 6% veterans ■ 35% 1-2yr ■ 60% new
Of 136 current holders: 81 (60%) entered in the past year, only 8 (6%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
📋

Smaller funds dominant — 13% AUM from top-100

13% from top-100 AUM funds
24 of 130 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 13% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
5.4
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 5.4/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ALMS

In 2025 Q4, 80 hedge funds were net buyers of ALMS (30 opened a new position, 50 added to an existing one), while 59 reduced or exited (34 trimmed, 25 sold completely) — a 58% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 7 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. Net fund flow last quarter: +5 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 130.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ALMS

How many hedge funds hold ALMS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ALMS vs. share price

Market Analysis: ALMS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ALMS

Healthcare Biotechnology

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

26 top-rated funds 6 high-conviction
Consensus
6.2
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
3.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ALMS
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 6 days 136 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ALMS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 136 131 3.82%
13F Shares 80M 80M -0.16%
Total Value $775M $72.26B -98.93%
New Positions 30 31 -1
Increased Positions 55 46 +9
Closed Positions 26 18 +8
Reduced Positions 45 42 +3
Total Calls 3 2 50.0%
Total Puts 5 4 25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.67 2.0 Bearish

Statistics: ALMS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

136 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ALMS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

Top 25 institutional holders of ALMS — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 TOWERVIEW LLC 3.16% 222,294 $4.9M
2 ACT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 3.02% 174,250 $3.8M
3 Trium Capital LLP 2.97% 191,391 $4.2M
4 Informed Momentum Co LLC 0.21% 83,187 $1.8M
5 ROYCE & ASSOCIATES LP 0.10% 476,392 $10.5M
6 SmartHarvest Portfolios, LLC 0.09% 9,607 $212K
7 Caitong International Asset Management Co., Ltd 0.08% 19,708 $434K
8 Persistent Asset Partners Ltd 0.07% 253 $179K
9 Integrated Quantitative Investments LLC 0.06% 15,423 $340K
10 Inscription Capital, LLC 0.06% 26,213 $577K
11 China Universal Asset Management Co., Ltd. 0.04% 22,436 $494K
12 Kera Capital Partners, Inc. 0.03% 11,003 $242K
13 GSA CAPITAL PARTNERS LLP 0.03% 18,436 —
14 Hudson Bay Capital Management LP 0.01% 193,395 $4.3M
15 PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 0.01% 538,733 $11.9M
16 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC 0.01% 1,058,051 $23.3M
17 UBS Group AG 0.01% 3,054,865 $67.3M
18 PROFUND ADVISORS LLC 0.01% 10,021 $221K
19 Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc 0.01% 169,497 $3.7M
20 State of Wyoming 0.01% 2,590 $57K
21 INTECH INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC 0.01% 29,591 $652K
22 OpenArc Corporate Advisory, LLC 0.00% 14,240 $314K
23 STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP 0.00% 209,729 $4.6M
24 Russell Investments Group, Ltd. 0.00% 162,180 $3.6M
25 Ameritas Investment Partners, Inc. 0.00% 5,609 $124K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — ALUMIS INC COM (ALMS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ALMS?

Buying streak — 7 quarters in a row: For 7 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ALMS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ALMS?

Slight buying edge — 58% buying: Last quarter: 80 funds bought or added vs 59 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for ALMS holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 13% AUM from top-100: 24 of 130 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 13% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held ALMS?

Mostly new holders — 48% entered in last year: Only 8 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.