Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Asana Inc (ASAN)

255 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ASAN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +11
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
57%

Smart Money Signals — ASAN

Based on 249 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ASAN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
249 hedge funds hold ASAN right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +10% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+22 new funds entered over the past year (+10% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 57% buying

153 buying114 selling
Last quarter: 153 funds bought or added vs 114 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~56 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 46 → 38 → 53 → 56. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years

53% conviction (2yr+) 23% medium 24% new
132 out of 249 hedge funds have held ASAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +20%, value -43%

Value
-43%
Shares
+20%
Last quarter: funds added +20% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -43%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

46 → 46 → 38 → 53 → 56 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 46 → 38 → 53 → 56. A growing number of institutions are discovering ASAN each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 63% veterans vs 24% newcomers

63% veterans 13% 1-2yr 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 264 holders: 167 (63%) are 2+ year veterans, 34 entered 1–2 years ago, and 63 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds

53% from top-100 AUM funds
45 of 245 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in ASAN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ASAN

In 2026 Q1, 153 hedge funds were net buyers of ASAN (56 opened a new position, 97 added to an existing one), while 114 reduced or exited (69 trimmed, 45 sold completely) — a 57% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 53% of total institutional value in ASAN is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +11 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 249.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ASAN

How many hedge funds hold ASAN — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ASAN vs. share price

Market Analysis: ASAN

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ASAN

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

11 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ASAN
255 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ASAN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 255 251 1.59%
13F Shares 109M 104M 4.49%
Total Value $748M $674M 10.87%
New Positions 60 56 +4
Increased Positions 115 96 +19
Closed Positions 54 43 +11
Reduced Positions 55 65 -10
Total Calls 7 7 -
Total Puts 9 12 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.29 1.71 Bearish

Statistics: ASAN

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

255 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ASAN. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ASAN holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Westerly Capital Management, LLC 3.91% 3,030,000 $21.2M
2 PharVision Advisers, LLC 1.36% 10,309 $72K
3 Capstone Capital Management Ltd 0.29% 91,460 $640K
4 Olympiad Research LP 0.26% 17,980 $126K
5 Whetstone Capital Advisors, LLC 0.19% 105,100 $736K
6 Crawford Fund Management, LLC 0.14% 131,000 $917K
7 Voleon Capital Management LP 0.13% 1,040,319 $7.3M
8 Numerai GP LLC 0.13% 227,814 $1.6M
9 Paragon Capital Management Ltd 0.12% 94,152 $659K
10 Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC 0.12% 129,379 $906K
11 Harbour Capital Advisors, LLC 0.08% 57,200 $419K
12 Retirement Planning Co of New England, Inc. 0.07% 28,807 $202K
13 Caitong International Asset Management Co., Ltd 0.07% 73,613 $515K
14 Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC 0.07% 536,732 $3.8M
15 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.07% 2,806,411 $19.6M
16 Counterpoint Mutual Funds LLC 0.06% 92,371 $647K
17 Y-Intercept (Hong Kong) Ltd 0.06% 439,440 $3.1M
18 XTX Topco Ltd 0.06% 660,864 $4.6M
19 Bayforest Capital Ltd 0.05% 7,233 $51K
20 Catalyst Private Wealth, LLC 0.05% 13,793 $97K
21 Engineers Gate Manager LP 0.04% 456,777 $3.2M
22 Axq Capital, LP 0.04% 51,975 $364K
23 Archford Capital Strategies, LLC 0.04% 50,000 $350K
24 Quinn Opportunity Partners LLC 0.03% 88,899 $622K
25 Aigen Investment Management, LP 0.03% 15,006 $105K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Asana Inc (ASAN)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ASAN?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ASAN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ASAN?

Slight buying edge — 57% buying: Last quarter: 153 funds bought or added vs 114 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for ASAN holders?

Elite ownership — 53% AUM from top-100 funds: 45 of 245 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 53% of total institutional value in ASAN. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ASAN?

53% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 132 out of 249 hedge funds have held ASAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →