2 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ASBP. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.
Based on 2 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.
In 2026 Q1, 0 hedge funds were net buyers of ASBP, while 29 reduced or exited (1 trimmed, 28 sold completely) — a 0% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net fund flow last quarter: -28 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 2.
Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.
Signal Freshness measures how much ASBP has moved relative to its sector benchmark (XLV) since the 2026 Q2 13F filing. A stock that has barely outrun its sector is still a relatively fresh entry point — the fund's thesis has not yet been priced in by the broader market.
ASBP outperformed XLV by +105.4% since June 30, 2026.
Interpretation: The stock has significantly outperformed its sector benchmark — the original entry opportunity has largely been captured by earlier investors. Learn more →
No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.
Track Smart Money conviction in ASBP. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.
| Metric | All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) | Prior (2025 Q4) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funds Holding | 2 | 30 | -93.33% |
| 13F Shares | 25K | 7M | -99.63% |
| Total Value | $8K | $28M | -99.97% |
| New Positions | 0 | 7 | -7 |
| Increased Positions | 0 | 7 | -7 |
| Closed Positions | 28 | 3 | +25 |
| Reduced Positions | 1 | 3 | -2 |
| Total Calls | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Puts | 0 | 0 | - |
| PUT/CALL Ratio | 0.0 | 0.0 | Bullish |
| Market Cap | -- |
| Enterprise Value | -- |
| Trailing P/E | -- |
| Forward P/E | -- |
| PEG Ratio (5yr expected) | -- |
| Price/Sales (ttm) | -- |
| Price/Book (mrq) | -- |
| Enterprise Value/Revenue | -- |
| Enterprise Value/EBITDA | -- |
| Beta (5Y Monthly) | -- |
| Short Ratio (Days to Cover) | -- |
| Short % of Float | -- |
| Profit Margin | -- |
| Return on Assets (ttm) | -- |
| Return on Equity (ttm) | -- |
| Revenue (ttm) | -- |
| Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) | -- |
| Diluted EPS (ttm) | -- |
| Total Cash (mrq) | -- |
| Total Debt/Equity (mrq) | -- |
| Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) | -- |
Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ASBP. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.
| Investor | Ownership History |
% of Portfolio | Prev % | Rank | Conviction | Avg Buy Price | 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y | Sell Timing | Shares | Mkt Value | Change | Change % | Source | Quarter | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their ASBP positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
Heavy selling pressure — only 0% buying: Last quarter: 29 funds sold vs only 0 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100: 0 of 2 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Mostly new holders — 50% entered in last year: Only 0 funds (0%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), ASBP has gained +16.3% vs -89.1% for XLV. The stock has significantly outperformed its sector benchmark — the original entry opportunity has largely been captured by earlier investors.
All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.
Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.