Based on 1 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their AUOTY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 25% of 3.0Y high
25% of all-time peak
Only 1 funds hold AUOTY today versus a peak of 4 funds at 2023 Q3 — just 25% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 67% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold AUOTY compared to a year ago (-67% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
1 buying1 selling
Last quarter: 1 funds bought or added vs 1 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 0 → 1 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
100% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 100% conviction (2yr+)
■ 0% medium
■ 0% new
1 out of 1 hedge funds have held AUOTY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +262% but shares only +50% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +262%, but actual share count only changed +50%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 0 → 1 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 1 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 100% veterans vs 0% newcomers
■ 100% veterans
■ 0% 1-2yr
■ 0% new
Entry-cohort mix of 1 holders: 1 (100%) are 2+ year veterans, 0 entered 1–2 years ago, and 0 (0%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 100% AUM from top-100 funds
100% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 1 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 100% of total institutional value in AUOTY. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.