Based on 415 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 5 quarters in a row
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added BC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
415 hedge funds hold BC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶
Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+36 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 50% buying
207 buying209 selling
Last quarter: 207 funds bought or added vs 209 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+24 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new BC position: 65 → 74 → 50 → 74. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
64% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 64% conviction (2yr+)
■ 18% medium
■ 18% new
267 out of 415 hedge funds have held BC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Price up while funds trimmed (+10% value, -5% shares)
Last quarter: total value of institutional BC holdings rose +10% even though funds reduced share count by 5%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~74 new funds/quarter
55 → 65 → 74 → 50 → 74 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 65 → 74 → 50 → 74. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Deep conviction — 69% of holders stayed 2+ years
■ 69% veterans
■ 10% 1-2yr
■ 22% new
Of 425 current holders: 292 (69%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆
Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds
56% from top-100 AUM funds
59 of 415 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 56% of total institutional value in BC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.