Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Ccc Intelligent Solutions Hl (CCCS)

349 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CCCS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +28
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
62%

Smart Money Signals — CCCS

Based on 370 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CCCS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
370 hedge funds hold CCCS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +10% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+33 new funds entered over the past year (+10% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying

261 buying160 selling
Last quarter: 261 funds were net buyers (105 opened a brand new position + 156 added to an existing one). Only 160 were sellers (83 trimmed + 77 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+35 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new CCCS position: 65 → 57 → 70 → 105. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
📌

Mixed — 37% long-term, 33% new

37% conviction (2yr+) 30% medium 33% new
Of the 370 current holders: 136 (37%) held >2 years, 112 held 1–2 years, and 122 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -8%, value -33%

Value
-33%
Shares
-7%
Last quarter: funds added -8% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -33%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

79 → 65 → 57 → 70 → 105 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 65 → 57 → 70 → 105. A growing number of institutions are discovering CCCS each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 44% veterans vs 38% newcomers

44% veterans 18% 1-2yr 38% new
Entry-cohort mix of 371 holders: 162 (44%) are 2+ year veterans, 67 entered 1–2 years ago, and 142 (38%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 44% AUM from top-100 funds

44% from top-100 AUM funds
54 of 370 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 44% of total institutional value in CCCS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CCCS

In 2026 Q1, 261 hedge funds were net buyers of CCCS (105 opened a new position, 156 added to an existing one), while 160 reduced or exited (83 trimmed, 77 sold completely) — a 62% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 44% of total institutional value in CCCS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +28 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 370.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CCCS

How many hedge funds hold CCCS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CCCS vs. share price

Market Analysis: CCCS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CCCS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

12 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.8
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CCCS
349 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CCCS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 349 370 -5.68%
13F Shares 621M 606M 2.6%
Total Value $2.82B $3.32B -14.97%
New Positions 68 105 -37
Increased Positions 94 155 -61
Closed Positions 89 77 +12
Reduced Positions 155 82 +73
Total Calls 1 1 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: CCCS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

349 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CCCS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CCCS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Alfreton Capital LLP 12.30% 9,500,000 $49.0M
2 Crescent Park Management, L.P. 10.66% 875,795 $4.3M
3 Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC 5.45% 12,516,625 $64.6M
4 Akre Capital Management LLC 3.01% 29,858,935 $154.1M
5 Rockbridge Asset Management LLC 2.25% 677,501 $3.5M
6 Dragoneer Investment Group, LLC 1.67% 9,196,301 $47.5M
7 Summit Creek Advisors LLC 1.56% 890,542 $4.6M
8 Edmond de Rothschild Holding S.A. 1.56% 22,927,668 $118.3M
9 2Xideas AG 1.31% 590,678 $3.0M
10 Wasatch Advisors LP 0.53% 15,548,321 $80.2M
11 Engine Capital Management, LP 0.48% 949,332 $4.9M
12 Snyder Capital Management L P 0.47% 5,233,032 $27.0M
13 Scalar Gauge Management, LLC 0.43% 150,000 $774K
14 Riverbridge Partners LLC 0.42% 2,907,042 $15.0M
15 Palisade Capital Management, LP 0.39% 1,741,956 $9.0M
16 Sona Asset Management (us) LLC 0.34% 3,182,847 $16.4M
17 Brown Brothers Harriman & Co 0.28% 12,490,320 $64.5M
18 Pinebridge Investments LLC 0.27% 6,260,419 $32.3M
19 Bayforest Capital Ltd 0.24% 49,303 $254K
20 London Co of Virginia 0.22% 7,498,579 $38.7M
21 Granite Investment Partners, LLC 0.22% 823,217 $4.2M
22 Delphi Financial Group, INC. 0.20% 76,529 $395K
23 RBF Capital, LLC 0.18% 848,364 $4.4M
24 Fort Washington Investment Advisors Inc /Oh/ 0.18% 6,887,602 $35.5M
25 ICONIQ Capital, LLC 0.17% 1,160,847 $6.0M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Ccc Intelligent Solutions Hl (CCCS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CCCS?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CCCS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CCCS?

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying: Last quarter: 261 funds were net buyers (105 opened a brand new position + 156 added to an existing one). Only 160 were sellers (83 trimmed + 77 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for CCCS holders?

Elite ownership — 44% AUM from top-100 funds: 54 of 370 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 44% of total institutional value in CCCS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CCCS?

Mixed — 37% long-term, 33% new: Of the 370 current holders: 136 (37%) held >2 years, 112 held 1–2 years, and 122 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →