Based on 6 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CLLNY than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 75% of 3.0Y peak
75% of all-time peak
6 funds currently hold this stock — 75% of the 3.0-year high of 8 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 25% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold CLLNY compared to a year ago (-25% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 60% buying
3 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds were net buyers (1 opened a brand new position + 2 added to an existing one). Only 2 were sellers (2 trimmed + 0 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 0 → 1 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 33% long-term, 17% new
■ 33% conviction (2yr+)
■ 50% medium
■ 17% new
Of the 6 current holders: 2 (33%) held >2 years, 3 held 1–2 years, and 1 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
1 → 0 → 0 → 1 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 0 → 1 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 50% veterans vs 33% newcomers
■ 50% veterans
■ 17% 1-2yr
■ 33% new
Entry-cohort mix of 6 holders: 3 (50%) are 2+ year veterans, 1 entered 1–2 years ago, and 2 (33%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 4% AUM from top-100
4% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 6 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 4% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.