Based on 12 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their CLSKW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 60% of 1.5Y high
60% of all-time peak
Only 12 funds hold CLSKW today versus a peak of 20 funds at 2024 Q4 — just 60% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 20% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
3 fewer hedge funds hold CLSKW compared to a year ago (-20% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 40% buying
2 buying3 selling
Last quarter: 3 funds reduced or exited vs 2 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~2 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 5 → 3 → 2. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 8% entered in last year
■ 0% conviction (2yr+)
■ 92% medium
■ 8% new
Only 0 funds (0%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -31%, value -72%
Last quarter: funds added -31% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -72%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~2 new funds/quarter
3 → 0 → 5 → 3 → 2 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 5 → 3 → 2. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 0% veterans, 17% new entrants
■ 0% veterans
■ 83% 1-2yr
■ 17% new
Of 12 current holders: 0 (0%) held 2+ years, 10 held 1–2 years, 2 (17%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆
Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds
47% from top-100 AUM funds
3 of 12 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in CLSKW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.