Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Choiceone Financia (COFS)

124 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in COFS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +6
Streak
9Q ▲
Buyers last Q
64%

Smart Money Signals — COFS

Based on 124 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 9 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 9 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added COFS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
124 hedge funds hold COFS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +33% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+31 new funds entered over the past year (+33% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 64% buying

75 buying43 selling
Last quarter: 75 funds were net buyers (26 opened a brand new position + 49 added to an existing one). Only 43 were sellers (23 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~26 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 17 → 20 → 22 → 26. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌

Mixed — 35% long-term, 38% new

35% conviction (2yr+) 27% medium 38% new
Of the 124 current holders: 44 (35%) held >2 years, 33 held 1–2 years, and 47 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💰

Value +23% but shares only +3% — price-driven

Value
+23%
Shares
+3%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +23%, but actual share count only changed +3%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

16 → 17 → 20 → 22 → 26 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 17 → 20 → 22 → 26. A growing number of institutions are discovering COFS each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 41% veterans vs 44% newcomers

41% veterans 15% 1-2yr 44% new
Entry-cohort mix of 124 holders: 51 (41%) are 2+ year veterans, 18 entered 1–2 years ago, and 55 (44%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 69% AUM from top-100 funds

69% from top-100 AUM funds
39 of 124 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 69% of total institutional value in COFS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.4
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.4/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — COFS

In 2026 Q2, 75 hedge funds were net buyers of COFS (26 opened a new position, 49 added to an existing one), while 43 reduced or exited (23 trimmed, 20 sold completely) — a 64% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 9 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 69% of total institutional value in COFS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +6 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 124.

Hedge Fund Ownership: COFS

How many hedge funds hold COFS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of COFS vs. share price

Market Analysis: COFS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: COFS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: COFS
124 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in COFS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 124 118 5.08%
13F Shares 7M 7M 3.08%
Total Value $235M $191M 23.11%
New Positions 26 22 +4
Increased Positions 49 40 +9
Closed Positions 20 13 +7
Reduced Positions 23 31 -8
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: COFS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

124 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in COFS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 COFS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Semanteon Capital Management, LP 1.13% 7,331 $249K
2 Shakespeare Wealth Management, LLC 0.24% 27,198 $925K
3 Meridian Financial Partners LLC 0.08% 7,125 $239K
4 Hbw Advisory Services LLC 0.08% 24,779 $842K
5 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.04% 74,709 $2.5M
6 Gendell Jeffrey L 0.04% 148,548 $5.1M
7 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.04% 87,466 $3.0M
8 Odyssean, LLC 0.03% 6,259 $213K
9 Numerai GP LLC 0.03% 10,698 $364K
10 Inspire Investing, LLC 0.03% 20,053 $682K
11 Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management LLC 0.02% 227,280 $7.7M
12 Capstone Financial Advisors, Inc. 0.01% 8,100 $275K
13 Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC 0.01% 13,747 $467K
14 Empowered Funds, LLC 0.01% 46,209 $1.6M
15 Brown Brothers Harriman & Co 0.01% 45,787 $1.6M
16 Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the 0.01% 219,602 $7.5M
17 XTX Topco Ltd 0.01% 12,920 $439K
18 Mutual Advisors, LLC 0.00% 7,633 $260K
19 Sterling Capital Management LLC 0.00% 8,350 $284K
20 Gradient Investments LLC 0.00% 9,318 $317K
21 Alliancebernstein L.P. 0.00% 342,635 $9.6M
22 American Century Companies Inc 0.00% 192,689 $6.6M
23 Cranbrook Wealth Management, LLC 0.00% 434 $15K
24 Strs Ohio 0.00% 21,600 $734K
25 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 100,803 $3.4M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Choiceone Financia (COFS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for COFS?

Buying streak — 9 quarters in a row: For 9 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added COFS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for COFS?

More buyers than sellers — 64% buying: Last quarter: 75 funds were net buyers (26 opened a brand new position + 49 added to an existing one). Only 43 were sellers (23 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for COFS holders?

Elite ownership — 69% AUM from top-100 funds: 39 of 124 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 69% of total institutional value in COFS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held COFS?

Mixed — 35% long-term, 38% new: Of the 124 current holders: 44 (35%) held >2 years, 33 held 1–2 years, and 47 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →