Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Canadian Solar Inc (CSIQ)

156 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CSIQ. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +31
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
62%

Smart Money Signals — CSIQ

Based on 167 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CSIQ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (98% of max)

98% of all-time peak
167 hedge funds hold CSIQ right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +38% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+46 new funds entered over the past year (+38% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying

109 buying66 selling
Last quarter: 109 funds were net buyers (52 opened a brand new position + 57 added to an existing one). Only 66 were sellers (45 trimmed + 21 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+23 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new CSIQ position: 21 → 42 → 29 → 52. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

60% of holders stayed for 2+ years

60% conviction (2yr+) 14% medium 26% new
101 out of 167 hedge funds have held CSIQ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +35% but shares only +18% — price-driven

Value
+35%
Shares
+17%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +35%, but actual share count only changed +18%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

19 → 21 → 42 → 29 → 52 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 21 → 42 → 29 → 52. A growing number of institutions are discovering CSIQ each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 69% veterans vs 24% newcomers

69% veterans 7% 1-2yr 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 182 holders: 126 (69%) are 2+ year veterans, 13 entered 1–2 years ago, and 43 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 68% AUM from top-100 funds

68% from top-100 AUM funds
35 of 156 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 68% of total institutional value in CSIQ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CSIQ

In 2026 Q2, 109 hedge funds were net buyers of CSIQ (52 opened a new position, 57 added to an existing one), while 66 reduced or exited (45 trimmed, 21 sold completely) — a 62% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 68% of total institutional value in CSIQ is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +31 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 167.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CSIQ

How many hedge funds hold CSIQ — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CSIQ vs. share price

Market Analysis: CSIQ

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CSIQ

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

5 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
3.4
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CSIQ
156 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CSIQ. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 156 136 14.71%
13F Shares 51M 44M 17.71%
Total Value $781M $577M 35.33%
New Positions 52 29 +23
Increased Positions 49 40 +9
Closed Positions 21 35 -14
Reduced Positions 40 43 -3
Total Calls 14 15 -6.67%
Total Puts 12 12 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.86 0.8 Neutral

Statistics: CSIQ

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

156 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CSIQ. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CSIQ holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Crystal Cove Asset Management, LLC 15.21% 870,500 $13.9M
2 Shah Capital Management 2.81% 923,716 $14.8M
3 Robotti Robert 1.03% 400,100 $6.4M
4 Optimize Financial INC. 1.00% 174,540 $2.8M
5 Sound Capital Solutions LLC 0.65% 174,540 $2.8M
6 Waterfront Wealth Inc. 0.44% 190,903 $2.9M
7 Green Alpha Advisors, LLC 0.41% 38,370 $615K
8 Templeton & Phillips Capital Management, LLC 0.27% 23,028 $369K
9 Persistent Asset Partners Ltd 0.25% 53,113 $851K
10 Diametric Capital, LP 0.15% 91,307 $1.5M
11 Guinness Atkinson Asset Management Inc 0.13% 17,848 $286K
12 MYDA Advisors LLC 0.12% 50,000 $801K
13 CoreCommodity Management, LLC 0.12% 37,060 $594K
14 Byrne Asset Management LLC 0.11% 12,842 $206K
15 BIT Capital GmbH 0.09% 191,986 $3.1M
16 Guinness Asset Management LTD 0.08% 311,173 $5.0M
17 Mackenzie Financial Corp 0.07% 4,621,062 $74.0M
18 Occudo Quantitative Strategies LP 0.05% 56,914 $912K
19 Aventail Capital Group, LP 0.05% 49,164 $788K
20 Bridgefront Capital, LLC 0.04% 10,339 $166K
21 Peregrine Asset Advisers, Inc. 0.04% 12,500 $200K
22 Pinpoint Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 0.04% 13,132 $210K
23 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.04% 64,401 $1.0M
24 Boothbay Fund Management, LLC 0.03% 149,240 $2.4M
25 Moore Capital Management, LP 0.03% 130,000 $2.1M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Canadian Solar Inc (CSIQ)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CSIQ?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CSIQ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CSIQ?

More buyers than sellers — 62% buying: Last quarter: 109 funds were net buyers (52 opened a brand new position + 57 added to an existing one). Only 66 were sellers (45 trimmed + 21 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for CSIQ holders?

Elite ownership — 68% AUM from top-100 funds: 35 of 156 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 68% of total institutional value in CSIQ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CSIQ?

60% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 101 out of 167 hedge funds have held CSIQ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →