Based on 372 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added CUZ than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
372 hedge funds hold CUZ right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding CUZ is almost the same as a year ago (+3 funds, +1% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 58% buying
217 buying158 selling
Last quarter: 217 funds bought or added vs 158 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+21 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new CUZ position: 51 → 41 → 53 → 74. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
59% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 59% conviction (2yr+)
■ 24% medium
■ 18% new
218 out of 372 hedge funds have held CUZ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📈
Growing discovery — still being found
51 → 51 → 41 → 53 → 74 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 51 → 41 → 53 → 74. A growing number of institutions are discovering CUZ each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 64% veterans vs 23% newcomers
■ 64% veterans
■ 14% 1-2yr
■ 23% new
Entry-cohort mix of 373 holders: 237 (64%) are 2+ year veterans, 51 entered 1–2 years ago, and 85 (23%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 40% AUM from top-100 funds
40% from top-100 AUM funds
57 of 372 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 40% of total institutional value in CUZ. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.