Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Invesco Exchange Traded Fd T (CZA)

58 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in CZA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +1
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
28%

Smart Money Signals — CZA

Based on 62 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CZA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
62 hedge funds hold CZA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +13% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+7 new funds entered over the past year (+13% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 28% buying

17 buying43 selling
Last quarter: 43 funds sold vs only 17 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~10 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 7 → 10 → 10. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

73% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 73% conviction (2yr+) ■ 8% medium ■ 19% new
45 out of 62 hedge funds have held CZA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~10 new funds/quarter

4 → 2 → 7 → 10 → 10 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 7 → 10 → 10. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 77% veterans vs 18% newcomers

■ 77% veterans ■ 5% 1-2yr ■ 18% new
Entry-cohort mix of 62 holders: 48 (77%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 11 (18%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds

56% from top-100 AUM funds
17 of 62 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 56% of total institutional value in CZA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.8
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.8/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — CZA

In 2026 Q1, 17 hedge funds were net buyers of CZA (10 opened a new position, 7 added to an existing one), while 43 reduced or exited (34 trimmed, 9 sold completely) — a 28% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 56% of total institutional value in CZA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +1 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 62.

Hedge Fund Ownership: CZA

How many hedge funds hold CZA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of CZA vs. share price

Market Analysis: CZA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: CZA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

3 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.6
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: CZA
58 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in CZA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 58 62 -6.45%
13F Shares 619K 723K -14.33%
Total Value $76M $76M -0.85%
New Positions 6 10 -4
Increased Positions 9 7 +2
Closed Positions 10 9 +1
Reduced Positions 21 34 -13
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: CZA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

58 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in CZA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 CZA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Pacific Sun Financial Corp 0.96% 18,972 $2.3M
2 Empirical Asset Management, LLC 0.44% 16,047 $2.0M
3 Davis Investment Partners, LLC 0.43% 11,425 $1.4M
4 Willner & Heller, LLC 0.42% 5,464 $670K
5 Rodgers & Associates, LTD 0.25% 22,167 $2.7M
6 Quattro Advisors LLC 0.19% 2,305 $283K
7 Colonial River Investments, LLC 0.17% 4,974 $610K
8 Well Done, LLC 0.13% 7,580 $929K
9 Victory Financial Group, LLC 0.04% 2,921 $358K
10 Mainstay Capital Management LLC /Adv 0.03% 2,793 $342K
11 Spectrum Wealth Advisory Group, LLC 0.02% 579 $71K
12 Sovran Advisors, LLC 0.02% 1,792 $228K
13 Tidemark, LLC 0.02% 575 $71K
14 Silver Grove Financial Group, Inc. 0.01% 216 $26K
15 First Heartland Consultants, Inc. 0.01% 1,699 $208K
16 J.W. Cole Advisors, INC. 0.01% 5,496 $674K
17 Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC 0.01% 70,010 $8.6M
18 EP Wealth Advisors, LLC 0.01% 10,946 $1.3M
19 Huntington National Bank 0.00% 7,946 $974K
20 Mission Wealth Management, LP 0.00% 2,695 $330K
21 LPL Financial LLC 0.00% 104,652 $12.8M
22 Truist Financial Corp 0.00% 18,474 $2.3M
23 Savant Capital, LLC 0.00% 6,589 $808K
24 Mml Investors Services, LLC 0.00% 8,193 $1.0M
25 Private Advisor Group, LLC 0.00% 2,167 $266K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Invesco Exchange Traded Fd T (CZA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for CZA?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added CZA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for CZA?

Heavy selling pressure — only 28% buying: Last quarter: 43 funds sold vs only 17 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for CZA holders?

Elite ownership — 56% AUM from top-100 funds: 17 of 62 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 56% of total institutional value in CZA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held CZA?

73% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 45 out of 62 hedge funds have held CZA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →