Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Dream Finders Homes Inc (DFH)

199 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in DFH. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +9
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
57%

Smart Money Signals — DFH

Based on 201 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added DFH than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
201 hedge funds hold DFH right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
〰️

Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year

fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding DFH is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 57% buying

123 buying91 selling
Last quarter: 123 funds bought or added vs 91 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~46 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 26 → 30 → 45 → 46. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

44% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 44% conviction (2yr+) ■ 28% medium ■ 28% new
88 out of 201 hedge funds have held DFH for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +36% but shares only +7% — price-driven

Value
+35%
Shares
+6%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +36%, but actual share count only changed +7%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

37 → 26 → 30 → 45 → 46 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 26 → 30 → 45 → 46. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 52% veterans vs 26% newcomers

■ 52% veterans ■ 22% 1-2yr ■ 26% new
Entry-cohort mix of 204 holders: 106 (52%) are 2+ year veterans, 44 entered 1–2 years ago, and 54 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds

51% from top-100 AUM funds
43 of 201 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in DFH. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — DFH

In 2026 Q2, 123 hedge funds were net buyers of DFH (46 opened a new position, 77 added to an existing one), while 91 reduced or exited (54 trimmed, 37 sold completely) — a 57% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 51% of total institutional value in DFH is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +9 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 201.

Hedge Fund Ownership: DFH

How many hedge funds hold DFH — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of DFH vs. share price

Market Analysis: DFH

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: DFH

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

13 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
5.0
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.4
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: DFH
199 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in DFH. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 199 192 3.65%
13F Shares 31M 29M 5.28%
Total Value $529M $408M 29.67%
New Positions 46 45 +1
Increased Positions 74 77 -3
Closed Positions 39 41 -2
Reduced Positions 53 44 +9
Total Calls 1 2 -50.0%
Total Puts 2 2 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 2.0 1.0 Bearish

Statistics: DFH

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

199 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in DFH. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 DFH holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Bretton Capital Management, LLC 2.35% 170,500 $2.9M
2 Arcus Capital Partners, LLC 1.97% 276,258 $4.8M
3 Elgethun Capital Management 1.97% 819,406 $14.1M
4 Denali Advisors LLC 0.56% 321,182 $5.5M
5 Cooke & Bieler LP 0.37% 1,870,801 $32.3M
6 VARCOV Co. 0.28% 42,323 $730K
7 Numerai GP LLC 0.19% 137,648 $2.4M
8 Jackson Square Capital, LLC 0.17% 69,500 $1.2M
9 Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC 0.16% 3,072,095 $53.0M
10 Elevation Point Wealth Partners, LLC 0.11% 344,821 $6.0M
11 Game Plan Financial Advisors, LLC 0.06% 9,000 $155K
12 Vestmark Advisory Solutions, Inc. 0.06% 344,796 $6.0M
13 Campbell & CO Investment Adviser LLC 0.05% 54,488 $940K
14 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.04% 58,397 $1.0M
15 SummitTX Capital, L.P. 0.03% 74,861 $1.3M
16 CastleKnight Management LP 0.03% 126,700 $2.2M
17 Quent Capital, LLC 0.03% 23,836 $411K
18 Palouse Capital Management, Inc. 0.02% 1,642 $28K
19 Atom Investors LP 0.02% 10,862 $187K
20 State of Wyoming 0.02% 9,495 $164K
21 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.02% 13,903 $240K
22 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.01% 24,113 $416K
23 Jupiter Topco LLC 0.01% 1,922,596 $33.2M
24 Hrt Financial LP 0.01% 334,616 $5.8M
25 Point72 Asset Management, L.P. 0.01% 457,332 $7.9M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Dream Finders Homes Inc (DFH)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for DFH?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added DFH than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for DFH?

Slight buying edge — 57% buying: Last quarter: 123 funds bought or added vs 91 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for DFH holders?

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds: 43 of 201 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in DFH. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held DFH?

44% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 88 out of 201 hedge funds have held DFH for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →