Based on 27 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added EFNL than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
27 hedge funds hold EFNL right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +80% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+12 new funds entered over the past year (+80% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 55% buying
16 buying13 selling
Last quarter: 16 funds bought or added vs 13 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~9 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 7 → 3 → 7 → 9. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 37% long-term, 41% new
■ 37% conviction (2yr+)
■ 22% medium
■ 41% new
Of the 27 current holders: 10 (37%) held >2 years, 6 held 1–2 years, and 11 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💰
Value +763% but shares only +662% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +763%, but actual share count only changed +662%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter
7 → 7 → 3 → 7 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 7 → 3 → 7 → 9. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 41% veterans vs 37% newcomers
■ 41% veterans
■ 22% 1-2yr
■ 37% new
Entry-cohort mix of 27 holders: 11 (41%) are 2+ year veterans, 6 entered 1–2 years ago, and 10 (37%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 83% AUM from top-100 funds
83% from top-100 AUM funds
9 of 27 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 83% of total institutional value in EFNL. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.9
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.9/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.