Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Enersys (ENS)

490 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ENS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +63
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
60%

Smart Money Signals — ENS

Based on 496 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ENS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
496 hedge funds hold ENS right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +34% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+125 new funds entered over the past year (+34% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying

299 buying200 selling
Last quarter: 299 funds were net buyers (111 opened a brand new position + 188 added to an existing one). Only 200 were sellers (152 trimmed + 48 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~111 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 42 → 49 → 108 → 111. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years

54% conviction (2yr+) 21% medium 25% new
270 out of 496 hedge funds have held ENS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

64 → 42 → 49 → 108 → 111 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 42 → 49 → 108 → 111. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 63% veterans vs 27% newcomers

63% veterans 10% 1-2yr 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 507 holders: 317 (63%) are 2+ year veterans, 51 entered 1–2 years ago, and 139 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds

60% from top-100 AUM funds
60 of 493 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in ENS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ENS

In 2026 Q1, 299 hedge funds were net buyers of ENS (111 opened a new position, 188 added to an existing one), while 200 reduced or exited (152 trimmed, 48 sold completely) — a 60% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 60% of total institutional value in ENS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +63 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 496.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ENS

How many hedge funds hold ENS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ENS vs. share price

Market Analysis: ENS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ENS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Growing Institutional Interest

Quality funds are building positions — conviction is rising but not yet widespread.

37 top-rated funds 5 high-conviction
Consensus
6.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
6.1
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ENS
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 2 days 490 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ENS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 490 432 13.43%
13F Shares 35M 37M -3.52%
Total Value $5.76B $5.30B 8.77%
New Positions 108 108 -
Increased Positions 183 130 +53
Closed Positions 50 42 +8
Reduced Positions 149 144 +5
Total Calls 7 9 -22.22%
Total Puts 7 7 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.78 Neutral

Statistics: ENS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

490 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ENS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 ENS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 New South Capital Management Inc 7.52% 733,708 $171.6M
2 Scopia Capital Management LP 6.07% 28,993 $6.8M
3 Riposte Capital LLC 4.15% 80,000 $18.7M
4 Carmel Capital Management L.L.C. 3.78% 73,760 $17.2M
5 Lightrock Netherlands B.V. 3.32% 166,406 $16.8M
6 Lumbard & Kellner, LLC 3.12% 44,024 $10.3M
7 Paradigm Capital Management Inc/Ny 2.78% 437,300 $102.2M
8 Arlington Capital Management, Inc. 2.70% 18,538 $4.3M
9 Tributary Capital Management, LLC 1.87% 97,246 $22.7M
10 Globeflex Capital L P 1.62% 54,162 $12.7M
11 Silver Lake Advisory, LLC 1.61% 19,244 $4.5M
12 Skylands Capital, LLC 1.27% 44,365 $10.4M
13 Hill City Capital, LP 1.13% 190,000 $44.4M
14 Moody Aldrich Partners LLC 1.01% 24,017 $5.6M
15 Earnest Partners LLC 0.76% 896,981 $209.7M
16 Kennedy Capital Management LLC 0.71% 171,566 $40.1M
17 ABLE Financial Group, LLC 0.66% 16,873 $3.9M
18 Mirova 0.65% 75,268 $17.6M
19 Florida Financial Advisors, LLC 0.63% 16,025 $3.7M
20 Bright Futures Wealth Management, LLC. 0.60% 3,957 $925K
21 Ridge Creek Global, Inc 0.51% 2,830 $662K
22 Seizert Capital Partners, LLC 0.50% 51,373 $12.0M
23 Algert Global LLC 0.47% 171,129 $40.0M
24 denkapparat Operations GmbH 0.47% 6,086 $1.4M
25 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.45% 160,483 $37.5M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Enersys (ENS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ENS?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ENS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ENS?

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying: Last quarter: 299 funds were net buyers (111 opened a brand new position + 188 added to an existing one). Only 200 were sellers (152 trimmed + 48 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for ENS holders?

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds: 60 of 493 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in ENS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ENS?

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 270 out of 496 hedge funds have held ENS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →