Based on 13 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added FJTSY than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 76% of 3.0Y peak
76% of all-time peak
13 funds currently hold this stock — 76% of the 3.0-year high of 17 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding FJTSY is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 82% buying
9 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 9 funds were net buyers (3 opened a brand new position + 6 added to an existing one). Only 2 were sellers (1 trimmed + 1 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 1 → 9 → 1 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 31% long-term, 54% new
■ 31% conviction (2yr+)
■ 15% medium
■ 54% new
Of the 13 current holders: 4 (31%) held >2 years, 2 held 1–2 years, and 7 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +448%, value +431%
Last quarter: funds added +448% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +431%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
2 → 1 → 9 → 1 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 1 → 9 → 1 → 3. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 31% veterans, 54% new entrants
■ 31% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 54% new
Of 13 current holders: 4 (31%) held 2+ years, 2 held 1–2 years, 7 (54%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 5% AUM from top-100
5% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 13 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 5% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.