Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Shift4 Pmts Inc (FOUR/PRA)

47 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in FOUR/PRA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +1
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
41%

Smart Money Signals — FOUR/PRA

Based on 47 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FOUR/PRA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
47 hedge funds hold FOUR/PRA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +7% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+3 new funds entered over the past year (+7% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 41% buying

17 buying24 selling
Last quarter: 24 funds reduced or exited vs 17 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-8 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 9 → 9 → 17 → 9. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 55% entered in last year

■ 6% conviction (2yr+) ■ 38% medium ■ 55% new
Only 3 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +0%, value -94%

Value
-93%
Shares
+0%
Last quarter: funds added +0% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -94%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter

42 → 9 → 9 → 17 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 9 → 9 → 17 → 9. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🌱

Early stage — 94% of holders entered in last year

■ 6% veterans ■ 0% 1-2yr ■ 94% new
Of 47 current holders: 44 (94%) entered in the past year, only 3 (6%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
🏆

Elite ownership — 49% AUM from top-100 funds

49% from top-100 AUM funds
14 of 47 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 49% of total institutional value in FOUR/PRA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
5.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 5.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — FOUR/PRA

In 2026 Q2, 17 hedge funds were net buyers of FOUR/PRA (9 opened a new position, 8 added to an existing one), while 24 reduced or exited (16 trimmed, 8 sold completely) — a 41% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 49% of total institutional value in FOUR/PRA is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +1 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 47.

Hedge Fund Ownership: FOUR/PRA

How many hedge funds hold FOUR/PRA — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of FOUR/PRA vs. share price

Market Analysis: FOUR/PRA

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: FOUR/PRA

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

1 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
1.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: FOUR/PRA
47 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in FOUR/PRA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 47 46 2.17%
13F Shares 9M 9M 0.26%
Total Value $546M $8.49B -93.57%
New Positions 9 17 -8
Increased Positions 8 15 -7
Closed Positions 8 13 -5
Reduced Positions 16 8 +8
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: FOUR/PRA

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

47 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in FOUR/PRA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 FOUR/PRA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Skaana Management L.P. 4.34% 330,944 $20.2M
2 Mariner Investment Group LLC 0.74% 55,000 $3.4M
3 Stansberry Asset Management, LLC 0.58% 101,709 $6.3M
4 Susquehanna Advisors Group, INC. 0.56% 520,000 $32.4M
5 Credit Industriel Et Commercial 0.49% 125,000 $7.6M
6 Context Capital Management, LLC 0.42% 350,000 $21.8M
7 Wolverine Asset Management LLC 0.36% 667,140 $41.4M
8 Ssi Investment Management LLC 0.36% 100,000 $6.2M
9 Highbridge Capital Management LLC 0.32% 210,000 $13.1M
10 Advent Capital Management /de/ 0.31% 221,869 $13.8M
11 Sculptor Capital LP 0.28% 554,195 $34.5M
12 Css LLC/Il 0.20% 81,137 $5.0M
13 1620 Investment Advisors, INC. 0.19% 4,879 $304K
14 Calamos Advisors LLC 0.09% 452,106 $28.2M
15 Magnetar Financial LLC 0.08% 145,660 $9.1M
16 BlueCrest Capital Management Ltd 0.08% 39,978 $2.5M
17 VELA Investment Management, LLC 0.08% 6,000 $374K
18 Tpg GP A, LLC 0.07% 60,000 $3.7M
19 Aequim Alternative Investments LP 0.07% 70,000 $4.4M
20 Ares Systematic Credit Ltd 0.06% 1,591 $99K
21 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.04% 969,939 $60.4M
22 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. 0.04% 1,235,207 $76.8M
23 MIRAE ASSET GLOBAL ETFS HOLDINGS Ltd. 0.02% 238,341 $14.8M
24 Register Financial Advisors LLC 0.01% 400 $25K
25 Gabelli Funds LLC 0.01% 18,000 $1.1M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Shift4 Pmts Inc (FOUR/PRA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for FOUR/PRA?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FOUR/PRA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for FOUR/PRA?

More sellers than buyers — 41% buying: Last quarter: 24 funds reduced or exited vs 17 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for FOUR/PRA holders?

Elite ownership — 49% AUM from top-100 funds: 14 of 47 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 49% of total institutional value in FOUR/PRA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held FOUR/PRA?

Mostly new holders — 55% entered in last year: Only 3 funds (6%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →