Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Freedom Holding Corp (FRHC)

143 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in FRHC. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +5
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
60%

Smart Money Signals — FRHC

Based on 145 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FRHC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
145 hedge funds hold FRHC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +23% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+27 new funds entered over the past year (+23% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying

92 buying61 selling
Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (29 opened a brand new position + 63 added to an existing one). Only 61 were sellers (37 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-10 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 32 → 17 → 39 → 29. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌

Mixed — 35% long-term, 37% new

35% conviction (2yr+) 28% medium 37% new
Of the 145 current holders: 51 (35%) held >2 years, 41 held 1–2 years, and 53 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares +157%, value +6%

Value
+5%
Shares
+156%
Last quarter: funds added +157% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +6%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

41 → 32 → 17 → 39 → 29 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 32 → 17 → 39 → 29. A growing number of institutions are discovering FRHC each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
📊

Mixed cohorts — 39% veterans, 53% new entrants

39% veterans 8% 1-2yr 53% new
Of 152 current holders: 60 (39%) held 2+ years, 12 held 1–2 years, 80 (53%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
🏆

Elite ownership — 84% AUM from top-100 funds

84% from top-100 AUM funds
36 of 144 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 84% of total institutional value in FRHC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.2
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.2/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — FRHC

In 2026 Q2, 92 hedge funds were net buyers of FRHC (29 opened a new position, 63 added to an existing one), while 61 reduced or exited (37 trimmed, 24 sold completely) — a 60% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 84% of total institutional value in FRHC is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +5 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 145.

Hedge Fund Ownership: FRHC

How many hedge funds hold FRHC — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of FRHC vs. share price

Market Analysis: FRHC

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: FRHC

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

8 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: FRHC
143 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in FRHC. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 143 140 2.14%
13F Shares 2M 2M 7.57%
Total Value $304M $312M -2.48%
New Positions 29 39 -10
Increased Positions 61 43 +18
Closed Positions 25 20 +5
Reduced Positions 35 36 -1
Total Calls 4 3 33.33%
Total Puts 4 3 33.33%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 1.0 Neutral

Statistics: FRHC

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

143 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in FRHC. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 FRHC holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Odyssean, LLC 0.46% 21,511 $2.8M
2 Yorktown Management & Research Co Inc 0.30% 3,700 $483K
3 Oak Thistle LLC 0.17% 13,701 $1.8M
4 VARCOV Co. 0.10% 1,920 $251K
5 Dark Forest Capital Management LP 0.09% 10,898 $1.4M
6 SmartHarvest Portfolios, LLC 0.08% 1,944 $254K
7 Harvest Investment Services, LLC 0.06% 2,961 $386K
8 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.04% 8,806 $1.1M
9 Headlands Technologies LLC 0.03% 2,436 $318K
10 Quadrature Capital Ltd 0.03% 26,449 $3.5M
11 Frec Markets, Inc. 0.03% 2,349 $306K
12 Silver Grove Financial Group, Inc. 0.02% 344 $45K
13 Mirabella Financial Services LLP 0.02% 1,699 $222K
14 Quantbot Technologies LP 0.02% 2,957 $386K
15 Voleon Capital Management LP 0.01% 5,879 $767K
16 Ethic Inc. 0.01% 6,095 $795K
17 Police & Firemen's Retirement System of New Jersey 0.01% 8,533 $1.1M
18 Wedmont Private Capital 0.01% 1,613 $268K
19 Quarry LP 0.01% 486 $63K
20 Aqr Capital Management LLC 0.01% 115,495 $14.9M
21 Quantinno Capital Management LP 0.00% 31,144 $4.1M
22 Evergreen Capital Management LLC 0.00% 2,030 $265K
23 Boothbay Fund Management, LLC 0.00% 2,321 $303K
24 State of New Jersey Common Pension Fund D 0.00% 8,250 $1.1M
25 Arizona State Retirement System 0.00% 5,065 $661K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Freedom Holding Corp (FRHC)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for FRHC?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added FRHC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for FRHC?

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying: Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (29 opened a brand new position + 63 added to an existing one). Only 61 were sellers (37 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for FRHC holders?

Elite ownership — 84% AUM from top-100 funds: 36 of 144 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 84% of total institutional value in FRHC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held FRHC?

Mixed — 35% long-term, 37% new: Of the 145 current holders: 51 (35%) held >2 years, 41 held 1–2 years, and 53 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →