Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added GENK than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 55% of 3.0Y high
55% of all-time peak
Only 17 funds hold GENK today versus a peak of 31 funds at 2023 Q4 — just 55% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 19% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
4 fewer hedge funds hold GENK compared to a year ago (-19% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 55% buying
6 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 6 funds bought or added vs 5 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~3 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 3 → 1 → 6 → 3. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
📌
Mixed — 29% long-term, 29% new
■ 29% conviction (2yr+)
■ 41% medium
■ 29% new
Of the 17 current holders: 5 (29%) held >2 years, 7 held 1–2 years, and 5 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~3 new funds/quarter
3 → 3 → 1 → 6 → 3 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 3 → 1 → 6 → 3. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
📊
Mixed cohorts — 29% veterans, 35% new entrants
■ 29% veterans
■ 35% 1-2yr
■ 35% new
Of 17 current holders: 5 (29%) held 2+ years, 6 held 1–2 years, 6 (35%) entered in the past year. Balanced distribution — some institutional memory, some recent momentum buyers.
✅
Strong quality — 28% AUM from major funds
28% from top-100 AUM funds
8 of 17 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 28% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 1.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.