Based on 139 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added GSBC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️
At the ownership peak (100% of max)
100% of all-time peak
139 hedge funds hold GSBC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶
Steady growth — +13% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+16 new funds entered over the past year (+13% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 58% buying
71 buying52 selling
Last quarter: 71 funds bought or added vs 52 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+11 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new GSBC position: 13 → 21 → 11 → 22. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
64% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 64% conviction (2yr+)
■ 17% medium
■ 19% new
89 out of 139 hedge funds have held GSBC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~22 new funds/quarter
13 → 13 → 21 → 11 → 22 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 13 → 21 → 11 → 22. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 20% newcomers
■ 70% veterans
■ 10% 1-2yr
■ 20% new
Entry-cohort mix of 139 holders: 97 (70%) are 2+ year veterans, 14 entered 1–2 years ago, and 28 (20%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 50% AUM from top-100 funds
50% from top-100 AUM funds
42 of 139 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 50% of total institutional value in GSBC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.