Based on 13 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 81% of 3.0Y peak
81% of all-time peak
13 funds currently hold this stock — 81% of the 3.0-year high of 16 funds (reached 2025 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶
Steady growth — +8% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+1 new funds entered over the past year (+8% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 83% buying
5 buying1 selling
Last quarter: 5 funds were net buyers (1 opened a brand new position + 4 added to an existing one). Only 1 were sellers (0 trimmed + 1 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 6 → 0 → 1 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
69% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 69% conviction (2yr+)
■ 31% medium
■ 0% new
9 out of 13 hedge funds have held GYRO for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +5%, value -17%
Last quarter: funds added +5% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -17%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
⚠️
Saturation — most institutions already know this story
0 → 6 → 0 → 1 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 6 → 0 → 1 → 1. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 69% veterans vs 15% newcomers
■ 69% veterans
■ 15% 1-2yr
■ 15% new
Entry-cohort mix of 13 holders: 9 (69%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 2 (15%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 4% AUM from top-100
4% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 13 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 4% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.0/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.