Based on 31 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added INUV than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 69% of 3.0Y high
69% of all-time peak
Only 31 funds hold INUV today versus a peak of 45 funds at 2024 Q1 — just 69% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 22% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
9 fewer hedge funds hold INUV compared to a year ago (-22% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 48% buying
12 buying13 selling
Last quarter: 13 funds reduced or exited vs 12 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+6 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new INUV position: 4 → 6 → 3 → 9. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
55% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 55% conviction (2yr+)
■ 23% medium
■ 23% new
17 out of 31 hedge funds have held INUV for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +3%, value -15%
Last quarter: funds added +3% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -15%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~9 new funds/quarter
6 → 4 → 6 → 3 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 4 → 6 → 3 → 9. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 61% veterans vs 26% newcomers
■ 61% veterans
■ 13% 1-2yr
■ 26% new
Entry-cohort mix of 31 holders: 19 (61%) are 2+ year veterans, 4 entered 1–2 years ago, and 8 (26%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 18% AUM from top-100
18% from top-100 AUM funds
10 of 31 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 18% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.