Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

ETF Ser Solutions (JETS)

177 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in JETS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +11
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
49%

Smart Money Signals — JETS

Based on 183 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added JETS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊

High ownership — 84% of 3.0Y peak

84% of all-time peak
183 funds currently hold this stock — 84% of the 3.0-year high of 218 funds (reached 2023 Q3). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶

Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+15 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 49% buying

85 buying89 selling
Last quarter: 89 funds reduced or exited vs 85 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~47 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 24 → 37 → 47 → 47. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years

63% conviction (2yr+) 18% medium 19% new
115 out of 183 hedge funds have held JETS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+15% value, -14% shares)

Value
+15%
Shares
-13%
Last quarter: total value of institutional JETS holdings rose +15% even though funds reduced share count by 14%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

27 → 24 → 37 → 47 → 47 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 24 → 37 → 47 → 47. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 71% veterans vs 17% newcomers

71% veterans 12% 1-2yr 17% new
Entry-cohort mix of 201 holders: 143 (71%) are 2+ year veterans, 24 entered 1–2 years ago, and 34 (17%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 68% AUM from top-100 funds

68% from top-100 AUM funds
25 of 177 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 68% of total institutional value in JETS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — JETS

In 2026 Q2, 85 hedge funds were net buyers of JETS (47 opened a new position, 38 added to an existing one), while 89 reduced or exited (53 trimmed, 36 sold completely) — a 49% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 68% of total institutional value in JETS is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +11 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 183.

Hedge Fund Ownership: JETS

How many hedge funds hold JETS — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of JETS vs. share price

Market Analysis: JETS

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: JETS

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

3 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.6
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: JETS
177 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in JETS. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 177 172 2.91%
13F Shares 28M 33M -13.89%
Total Value $968M $840M 15.23%
New Positions 47 47 -
Increased Positions 33 41 -8
Closed Positions 36 46 -10
Reduced Positions 48 34 +14
Total Calls 9 16 -43.75%
Total Puts 15 19 -21.05%
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.67 1.19 Bearish

Statistics: JETS

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

177 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in JETS. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 JETS holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Risk Paradigm Group, LLC 2.48% 95,130 $3.2M
2 PCJ Investment Counsel Ltd. 2.01% 210,000 $7.0M
3 Washington Growth Strategies LLC 1.43% 77,416 $2.6M
4 RPg Family Wealth Advisory, LLC 0.66% 95,130 $3.2M
5 Clearline Capital LP 0.25% 127,178 $4.2M
6 Fielder Capital Group LLC 0.25% 34,850 $1.2M
7 Ping Capital Management, INC. 0.21% 25,000 $830K
8 Dv Equities, LLC 0.20% 42,591 $1.4M
9 Gts Securities LLC 0.14% 202,436 $6.7M
10 WealthCare Investment Partners, LLC 0.13% 15,611 $519K
11 State of Wisconsin Investment Board 0.11% 1,632,649 $54.2M
12 Carrera Capital Advisors 0.11% 22,098 $734K
13 Timbuktu Capital Management, LLC 0.09% 1,850 $61K
14 StoneX Group Inc. 0.09% 67,304 $2.2M
15 Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. 0.08% 150,000 $5.0M
16 Highland Investment Advisors LLC 0.07% 5,041 $167K
17 Institute for Wealth Management, LLC. 0.07% 24,753 $822K
18 Roxbury Financial LLC 0.07% 2,631 $87K
19 SummitTX Capital, L.P. 0.06% 68,225 $2.3M
20 Brevan Howard Capital Management LP 0.06% 226,932 $7.5M
21 Quadrature Capital Ltd 0.06% 193,546 $6.4M
22 Ellis Investment Partners, LLC 0.05% 10,591 $352K
23 Arete Wealth Advisors, LLC 0.05% 43,564 $1.4M
24 Kelly Financial Services LLC 0.05% 6,639 $221K
25 Two Sigma Securities, LLC 0.04% 15,203 $505K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — ETF Ser Solutions (JETS)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for JETS?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added JETS than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for JETS?

More sellers than buyers — 49% buying: Last quarter: 89 funds reduced or exited vs 85 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for JETS holders?

Elite ownership — 68% AUM from top-100 funds: 25 of 177 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 68% of total institutional value in JETS. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held JETS?

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 115 out of 183 hedge funds have held JETS for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →