Based on 5 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their JOJO positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 56% of 3.0Y high
56% of all-time peak
Only 5 funds hold JOJO today versus a peak of 9 funds at 2023 Q3 — just 56% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 29% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
2 fewer hedge funds hold JOJO compared to a year ago (-29% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 29% buying
2 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 5 funds sold vs only 2 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~1 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 2 → 4 → 1. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄
Mostly new holders — 40% entered in last year
■ 20% conviction (2yr+)
■ 40% medium
■ 40% new
Only 1 funds (20%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~1 new funds/quarter
5 → 2 → 2 → 4 → 1 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 2 → 4 → 1. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 40% veterans vs 40% newcomers
■ 40% veterans
■ 20% 1-2yr
■ 40% new
Entry-cohort mix of 5 holders: 2 (40%) are 2+ year veterans, 1 entered 1–2 years ago, and 2 (40%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 0% AUM from top-100
0% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 5 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 0% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.