Based on 49 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their JUCY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 89% of 3.0Y peak
89% of all-time peak
49 funds currently hold this stock — 89% of the 3.0-year high of 55 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 11% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
6 fewer hedge funds hold JUCY compared to a year ago (-11% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 63% buying
34 buying20 selling
Last quarter: 34 funds were net buyers (6 opened a brand new position + 28 added to an existing one). Only 20 were sellers (13 trimmed + 7 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~6 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 7 → 5 → 9 → 6. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
49% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 49% conviction (2yr+)
■ 24% medium
■ 27% new
24 out of 49 hedge funds have held JUCY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~6 new funds/quarter
15 → 7 → 5 → 9 → 6 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 7 → 5 → 9 → 6. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 41% veterans vs 33% newcomers
■ 41% veterans
■ 27% 1-2yr
■ 33% new
Entry-cohort mix of 49 holders: 20 (41%) are 2+ year veterans, 13 entered 1–2 years ago, and 16 (33%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 6% AUM from top-100
6% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 49 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 6% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.