Based on 19 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added KIM/PRN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊
High ownership — 90% of 2.8Y peak
90% of all-time peak
19 funds currently hold this stock — 90% of the 2.8-year high of 21 funds (reached 2024 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
🚀
Fast accumulation — +27% more funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
+4 new funds entered over the past year (+27% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks. The peak was reached in just 1 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 62% buying
10 buying6 selling
Last quarter: 10 funds were net buyers (7 opened a brand new position + 3 added to an existing one). Only 6 were sellers (4 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~7 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 3 → 7. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
47% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 47% conviction (2yr+)
■ 21% medium
■ 32% new
9 out of 19 hedge funds have held KIM/PRN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~7 new funds/quarter
2 → 0 → 1 → 3 → 7 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 3 → 7. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 58% veterans vs 32% newcomers
■ 58% veterans
■ 11% 1-2yr
■ 32% new
Entry-cohort mix of 19 holders: 11 (58%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 6 (32%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 11% AUM from top-100
11% from top-100 AUM funds
6 of 19 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 11% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 3.5/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.