Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Karat Packaging Inc (KRT)

140 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in KRT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +11
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
63%

Smart Money Signals — KRT

Based on 140 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added KRT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
140 hedge funds hold KRT right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +10% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+13 new funds entered over the past year (+10% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying

92 buying54 selling
Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 59 added to an existing one). Only 54 were sellers (32 trimmed + 22 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+13 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new KRT position: 18 → 24 → 20 → 33. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

41% of holders stayed for 2+ years

41% conviction (2yr+) 29% medium 30% new
58 out of 140 hedge funds have held KRT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +35% but shares only +10% — price-driven

Value
+34%
Shares
+10%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +35%, but actual share count only changed +10%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

28 → 18 → 24 → 20 → 33 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 18 → 24 → 20 → 33. A growing number of institutions are discovering KRT each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 47% veterans vs 36% newcomers

47% veterans 17% 1-2yr 36% new
Entry-cohort mix of 140 holders: 66 (47%) are 2+ year veterans, 24 entered 1–2 years ago, and 50 (36%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds

55% from top-100 AUM funds
41 of 140 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in KRT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — KRT

In 2026 Q2, 92 hedge funds were net buyers of KRT (33 opened a new position, 59 added to an existing one), while 54 reduced or exited (32 trimmed, 22 sold completely) — a 63% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 55% of total institutional value in KRT is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +11 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 140.

Hedge Fund Ownership: KRT

How many hedge funds hold KRT — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of KRT vs. share price

Market Analysis: KRT

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: KRT

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: KRT
140 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in KRT. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 140 129 8.53%
13F Shares 7M 6M 10.22%
Total Value $217M $161M 34.56%
New Positions 33 20 +13
Increased Positions 59 53 +6
Closed Positions 22 12 +10
Reduced Positions 32 42 -10
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: KRT

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

140 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in KRT. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 KRT holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 De Lisle Partners LLP 0.80% 218,443 $7.3M
2 Ranger Investment Management, L.P. 0.70% 332,596 $11.1M
3 Ktf Investments, LLC 0.49% 146,145 $4.9M
4 North Star Investment Management Corp. 0.18% 97,000 $3.2M
5 Kings Path Partners LLC 0.17% 18,453 $465K
6 Punch & Associates Investment Management, INC. 0.16% 98,320 $3.3M
7 R Squared Ltd 0.15% 8,819 $295K
8 CWA Asset Management Group, LLC 0.14% 136,160 $4.6M
9 PDT Partners, LLC 0.06% 33,040 $1.1M
10 Odyssean, LLC 0.05% 9,552 $320K
11 Algert Global LLC 0.05% 122,248 $4.1M
12 Globeflex Capital L P 0.04% 9,152 $306K
13 Bard Associates Inc 0.04% 5,000 $167K
14 Compass Financial Management LLC 0.03% 8,153 $273K
15 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.03% 82,117 $2.7M
16 Inspire Investing, LLC 0.03% 20,456 $684K
17 Two Sigma Securities, LLC 0.02% 7,827 $262K
18 Ritholtz Wealth Management 0.01% 29,963 $1.0M
19 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.01% 12,065 $404K
20 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.01% 100,550 $3.4M
21 Occudo Quantitative Strategies LP 0.01% 6,317 $211K
22 O'shaughnessy Asset Management, LLC 0.01% 51,205 $1.7M
23 XTX Topco Ltd 0.01% 16,342 $547K
24 Mawer Investment Management Ltd. 0.01% 31,084 $1.0M
25 Moran Wealth Management, LLC 0.01% 7,742 $259K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Karat Packaging Inc (KRT)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for KRT?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added KRT than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for KRT?

More buyers than sellers — 63% buying: Last quarter: 92 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 59 added to an existing one). Only 54 were sellers (32 trimmed + 22 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for KRT holders?

Elite ownership — 55% AUM from top-100 funds: 41 of 140 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 55% of total institutional value in KRT. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held KRT?

41% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 58 out of 140 hedge funds have held KRT for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →