Based on 4 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their KUBTY positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 40% of 3.0Y high
40% of all-time peak
Only 4 funds hold KUBTY today versus a peak of 10 funds at 2025 Q2 — just 40% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 60% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
6 fewer hedge funds hold KUBTY compared to a year ago (-60% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 12% buying
1 buying7 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds sold vs only 1 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 2 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
75% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 75% conviction (2yr+)
■ 25% medium
■ 0% new
3 out of 4 hedge funds have held KUBTY for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -30%, value -56%
Last quarter: funds added -30% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -56%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
3 → 0 → 1 → 2 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 2 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 50% veterans vs 25% newcomers
■ 50% veterans
■ 25% 1-2yr
■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 4 holders: 2 (50%) are 2+ year veterans, 1 entered 1–2 years ago, and 1 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 78% AUM from top-100 funds
78% from top-100 AUM funds
1 of 4 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 78% of total institutional value in KUBTY. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.