Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Lithium Amers Corp New (LAC)

272 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in LAC. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +9
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
60%

Smart Money Signals — LAC

Based on 279 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added LAC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
279 hedge funds hold LAC right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +38% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+77 new funds entered over the past year (+38% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying

157 buying105 selling
Last quarter: 157 funds were net buyers (54 opened a brand new position + 103 added to an existing one). Only 105 were sellers (60 trimmed + 45 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~54 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 66 → 91 → 59 → 54. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 49% conviction (2yr+) ■ 25% medium ■ 26% new
136 out of 279 hedge funds have held LAC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Price up while funds trimmed (+23% value, -0% shares)

Value
+22%
Shares
+0%
Last quarter: total value of institutional LAC holdings rose +23% even though funds reduced share count by 0%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

22 → 66 → 91 → 59 → 54 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 66 → 91 → 59 → 54. LAC is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 57% veterans vs 27% newcomers

■ 57% veterans ■ 16% 1-2yr ■ 27% new
Entry-cohort mix of 296 holders: 169 (57%) are 2+ year veterans, 46 entered 1–2 years ago, and 81 (27%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 42% AUM from top-100 funds

42% from top-100 AUM funds
40 of 272 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 42% of total institutional value in LAC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.9
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.9/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — LAC

In 2026 Q2, 157 hedge funds were net buyers of LAC (54 opened a new position, 103 added to an existing one), while 105 reduced or exited (60 trimmed, 45 sold completely) — a 60% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 42% of total institutional value in LAC is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +9 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 279.

Hedge Fund Ownership: LAC

How many hedge funds hold LAC — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of LAC vs. share price

Market Analysis: LAC

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: LAC

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.9
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: LAC
272 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in LAC. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 272 270 0.74%
13F Shares 124M 124M -0.05%
Total Value $476M $387M 22.71%
New Positions 54 59 -5
Increased Positions 96 84 +12
Closed Positions 45 69 -24
Reduced Positions 59 56 +3
Total Calls 16 14 14.29%
Total Puts 7 7 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.44 0.5 Bullish

Statistics: LAC

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

272 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in LAC. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 LAC holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 General Motors Holdings LLC 72.38% 15,002,243 $57.8M
2 GK Wealth Management LLC 2.73% 1,427,275 $5.2M
3 Cedrus Wealth Group LLC 2.11% 626,518 $2.4M
4 Revisor Wealth Management LLC 0.39% 416,254 $1.6M
5 Old West Investment Management, LLC 0.36% 890,484 $3.4M
6 Teamwork Financial Advisors, LLC 0.31% 893,395 $3.4M
7 Hedges Asset Management LLC 0.23% 90,000 $346K
8 Quantify Chaos Advisors, LLC 0.21% 19,396 $75K
9 Independent Wealth Network Inc. 0.13% 137,215 $528K
10 Worth Venture Partners, LLC 0.09% 10,500 $40K
11 Reaves W H & Co Inc 0.07% 1,240,000 $4.8M
12 Alpha Wealth Funds, LLC 0.07% 32,085 $125K
13 SLT Holdings LLC 0.06% 26,000 $100K
14 Formidable Asset Management, LLC 0.06% 98,601 $383K
15 Credit Industriel Et Commercial 0.06% 230,000 $886K
16 Van Eck Associates Corp 0.05% 22,726,067 $87.5M
17 Blueshift Asset Management, LLC 0.05% 54,769 $211K
18 IFC & Insurance Marketing, Inc. 0.05% 13,750 $53K
19 Caitong International Asset Management Co., Ltd 0.04% 84,301 $325K
20 Balboa Wealth Partners 0.04% 81,687 $314K
21 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.04% 316,237 $1.2M
22 Encompass More Asset Management 0.03% 61,111 $235K
23 Signet Private Wealth LLC 0.03% 10,095 $39K
24 Jupiter Asset Management Ltd 0.03% 1,554,895 $6.0M
25 Ping Capital Management, INC. 0.03% 30,200 $116K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Lithium Amers Corp New (LAC)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for LAC?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added LAC than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for LAC?

More buyers than sellers — 60% buying: Last quarter: 157 funds were net buyers (54 opened a brand new position + 103 added to an existing one). Only 105 were sellers (60 trimmed + 45 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for LAC holders?

Elite ownership — 42% AUM from top-100 funds: 40 of 272 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 42% of total institutional value in LAC. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held LAC?

49% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 136 out of 279 hedge funds have held LAC for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →