Based on 17 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📈
Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added MDIA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🔻
Below peak — only 68% of 3.0Y high
68% of all-time peak
Only 17 funds hold MDIA today versus a peak of 25 funds at 2024 Q3 — just 68% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding MDIA is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟡
Slight buying edge — 58% buying
7 buying5 selling
Last quarter: 7 funds bought or added vs 5 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~4 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 0 → 3 → 4. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
41% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 41% conviction (2yr+)
■ 41% medium
■ 18% new
7 out of 17 hedge funds have held MDIA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Price up while funds trimmed (+50% value, -0% shares)
Last quarter: total value of institutional MDIA holdings rose +50% even though funds reduced share count by 0%. The stock price increased enough to offset the selling. Institutions are quietly trimming into price strength — watch for rotation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~4 new funds/quarter
3 → 2 → 0 → 3 → 4 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 0 → 3 → 4. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 47% veterans vs 12% newcomers
■ 47% veterans
■ 41% 1-2yr
■ 12% new
Entry-cohort mix of 17 holders: 8 (47%) are 2+ year veterans, 7 entered 1–2 years ago, and 2 (12%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 50% AUM from top-100 funds
50% from top-100 AUM funds
10 of 17 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 50% of total institutional value in MDIA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
Exit risk score 1.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.