Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Macrogenics Inc (MGNX)

123 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in MGNX. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +18
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
59%

Smart Money Signals — MGNX

Based on 124 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MGNX than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊

High ownership — 78% of 3.0Y peak

78% of all-time peak
124 funds currently hold this stock — 78% of the 3.0-year high of 159 funds (reached 2024 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📶

Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+15 new funds entered over the past year (+14% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 59% buying

78 buying55 selling
Last quarter: 78 funds bought or added vs 55 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+14 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new MGNX position: 18 → 13 → 30 → 44. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years

64% conviction (2yr+) 16% medium 20% new
79 out of 124 hedge funds have held MGNX for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +81% but shares only +10% — price-driven

Value
+81%
Shares
+10%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +81%, but actual share count only changed +10%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

26 → 18 → 13 → 30 → 44 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 18 → 13 → 30 → 44. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 73% veterans vs 16% newcomers

73% veterans 11% 1-2yr 16% new
Entry-cohort mix of 129 holders: 94 (73%) are 2+ year veterans, 14 entered 1–2 years ago, and 21 (16%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 41% AUM from top-100 funds

41% from top-100 AUM funds
41 of 124 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 41% of total institutional value in MGNX. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — MGNX

In 2026 Q2, 78 hedge funds were net buyers of MGNX (44 opened a new position, 34 added to an existing one), while 55 reduced or exited (29 trimmed, 26 sold completely) — a 59% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 41% of total institutional value in MGNX is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +18 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 124.

Hedge Fund Ownership: MGNX

How many hedge funds hold MGNX — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of MGNX vs. share price

Market Analysis: MGNX

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: MGNX

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

8 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
4.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: MGNX
123 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in MGNX. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 123 106 16.04%
13F Shares 49M 44M 10.34%
Total Value $214M $118M 80.63%
New Positions 43 30 +13
Increased Positions 31 28 +3
Closed Positions 26 9 +17
Reduced Positions 29 27 +2
Total Calls 3 3 -
Total Puts 2 2 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.67 0.67 Bullish

Statistics: MGNX

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

123 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in MGNX. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 MGNX holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Armistice Capital, LLC 0.28% 5,006,752 $23.1M
2 Affinity Asset Advisors, LLC 0.25% 1,216,606 $5.6M
3 EntryPoint Capital, LLC 0.24% 82,079 $349K
4 Diadema Partners LP 0.22% 374,403 $1.7M
5 nVerses Capital, LLC 0.21% 29,090 $134K
6 Velan Capital Investment Management LP 0.17% 60,000 $277K
7 Spark Investment Management LLC 0.16% 17,200 $79K
8 Persistent Asset Partners Ltd 0.13% 95,371 $441K
9 Timothy G. Youngquist 2020 Irrevocable Trust 0.09% 79,113 $127K
10 Ra Capital Management, L.P. 0.07% 1,864,176 $8.6M
11 Informed Momentum Co LLC 0.07% 171,705 $793K
12 Verdad Advisers, LP 0.06% 14,431 $67K
13 Wasatch Advisors LP 0.06% 2,018,881 $9.3M
14 Headlands Technologies LLC 0.05% 99,188 $458K
15 Lantern Wealth Advisors, LLC 0.05% 22,700 $105K
16 Ikarian Capital, LLC 0.04% 74,893 $346K
17 ADAR1 Capital Management, LLC 0.03% 129,822 $600K
18 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.02% 2,632,750 $12.2M
19 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.02% 1,002,274 $4.6M
20 Pinnacle Associates Ltd 0.01% 254,301 $1.2M
21 Prelude Capital Management, LLC 0.01% 26,300 $122K
22 Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 0.01% 1,000,412 $4.6M
23 XML Financial, LLC 0.01% 24,836 $115K
24 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.01% 2,465,699 $11.4M
25 Leonteq Securities AG 0.01% 50,000 $231K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Macrogenics Inc (MGNX)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for MGNX?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MGNX than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for MGNX?

Slight buying edge — 59% buying: Last quarter: 78 funds bought or added vs 55 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for MGNX holders?

Elite ownership — 41% AUM from top-100 funds: 41 of 124 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 41% of total institutional value in MGNX. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held MGNX?

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 79 out of 124 hedge funds have held MGNX for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →