Global X Fds (MLPA) Hedge Fund Ownership (Q2 2026)

Q: Is it too late to buy Global X Fds (MLPA) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, MLPA has moved -0.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to +0.2% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of -0.6%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), MLPA gained +6.1% vs -0.2% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Global X Fds (MLPA)

248 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in MLPA. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Smart Money Signals — MLPA

Based on 249 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q

For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MLPA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak

249 hedge funds hold MLPA right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.

📶

Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q

+31 new funds entered over the past year (+14% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.

🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

131 buying85 selling

Last quarter: 131 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 98 added to an existing one). Only 85 were sellers (61 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

➡️

Steady new buyers — ~33 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter

Funds opening this position for the first time: 28 → 29 → 34 → 33. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.

🔒

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 63% conviction (2yr+) ■ 17% medium ■ 20% new

158 out of 249 hedge funds have held MLPA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

📈

Growing discovery — still being found

25 → 28 → 29 → 34 → 33 new funds/Q

New funds entering each quarter: 28 → 29 → 34 → 33. A growing number of institutions are discovering MLPA each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.

🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 24% newcomers

■ 65% veterans ■ 11% 1-2yr ■ 24% new

Entry-cohort mix of 249 holders: 163 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 27 entered 1–2 years ago, and 59 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.

🏆

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

61% from top-100 AUM funds

21 of 248 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in MLPA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

3.7

out of 10

Low Exit Risk

Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Metric	All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)	Prior (2026 Q1)	Change
Funds Holding	248	240	3.33%
13F Shares	24M	25M	-0.76%
Total Value	$1.27B	$1.30B	-2.4%
New Positions	33	34	-1
Increased Positions	98	88	+10
Closed Positions	24	23	+1
Reduced Positions	61	65	-4
Total Calls	1	0	100%
Total Puts	0	0	-
PUT/CALL Ratio	0.0	0.0	Bullish

Metric

All 13F Filers (2026 Q2)

Prior (2026 Q1)

Change

Funds Holding

248

240

3.33%

13F Shares

24M

25M

-0.76%

Total Value

$1.27B

$1.30B

-2.4%

New Positions

-1

Increased Positions

+10

Closed Positions

Reduced Positions

-4

Total Calls

100%

Total Puts

PUT/CALL Ratio

0.0

Bullish

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

248 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in MLPA. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:

FILTER:All New Added To Reduced No Change | Overweight >5%

Top 25 MLPA holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
#	Investor	% of Portfolio	Shares	Mkt Value
1	Madrid Financial Services	13.73%	488,670	$25.9M
2	Matrix Private Capital Group LLC	3.46%	149,900	$8.0M
3	Legacy Wealth Asset Management, LLC	2.65%	227,634	$12.1M
4	Point Nemo Capital, LLC	2.65%	98,478	$5.2M
5	Barry Investment Advisors, LLC	2.28%	205,167	$10.9M
6	Wiser Advisor Group LLC	2.11%	36,302	$1.9M
7	Meixler Investment Management, Ltd.	1.85%	63,228	$3.4M
8	Guild Investment Management, Inc.	1.49%	41,120	$2.2M
9	Thor Investment Management Inc /Oh/ /Adv	1.49%	38,466	$1.7M
10	Naviter Wealth, LLC	0.97%	201,119	$10.7M
11	Clear Trail Advisors, LLC	0.86%	106,513	$5.7M
12	APS Management Group, Inc.	0.78%	19,203	$1.0M
13	Greenspring Advisors, LLC	0.74%	250,248	$13.3M
14	Almanack Investment Partners, LLC.	0.73%	108,309	$5.7M
15	Tectonic Advisors LLC	0.71%	277,970	$14.8M
16	Strong Tower Advisory Services	0.67%	70,782	$3.8M
17	TT Capital Management LLC	0.67%	16,200	$860K
18	LFG Wealth Partners, LLC	0.66%	26,477	$1.4M
19	Columbus Macro, LLC	0.61%	117,458	$6.2M
20	MBL Wealth, LLC	0.56%	155,692	$8.3M
21	Lynx Capital Group Ltd /Adv	0.56%	17,225	$763K
22	Private Advisory Group LLC	0.45%	157,059	$8.3M
23	Evergreen Capital Management LLC	0.45%	478,511	$25.4M
24	Demars Financial Group, LLC	0.43%	29,292	$1.6M
25	Cascade Financial Partners, LLC	0.42%	91,846	$4.9M

Investor	Ownership History	% of Portfolio	Prev %	Rank	Conviction	Avg Buy Price	13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y	Sell Timing	Shares	Mkt Value	Change	Change %	Source	Quarter	Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Global X Fds (MLPA)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for MLPA?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added MLPA than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for MLPA?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 131 funds were net buyers (33 opened a brand new position + 98 added to an existing one). Only 85 were sellers (61 trimmed + 24 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for MLPA holders?

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds: 21 of 248 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 61% of total institutional value in MLPA. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held MLPA?

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 158 out of 249 hedge funds have held MLPA for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Is it too late to buy Global X Fds (MLPA) following the 2026 Q2 hedge fund 13F filings?

As of today, MLPA has moved -0.4% since the 2026 Q2 13F filing date (August 14, 2026), compared to +0.2% for the SPY sector ETF — an outperformance of -0.6%. Since the quarter end (June 30, 2026), MLPA has gained +6.1% vs -0.2% for SPY. The stock is tracking its sector benchmark closely. The signal remains fresh and the entry point is still near the fund's implied reference.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Market Cap	--
Enterprise Value	--
Trailing P/E	--
Forward P/E	--
PEG Ratio (5yr expected)	--
Price/Sales (ttm)	--
Price/Book (mrq)	--
Enterprise Value/Revenue	--
Enterprise Value/EBITDA	--
Beta (5Y Monthly)	--
Short Ratio (Days to Cover)	--
Short % of Float	--

Profit Margin	--
Return on Assets (ttm)	--
Return on Equity (ttm)	--

Revenue (ttm)	--
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm)	--
Diluted EPS (ttm)	--
Total Cash (mrq)	--
Total Debt/Equity (mrq)	--
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm)	--

Global X Fds (MLPA)

Smart Money Signals — MLPA

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

Steady growth — +14% more funds vs a year ago

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

Steady new buyers — ~33 new funds per quarter

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years

Growing discovery — still being found

Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 24% newcomers

Elite ownership — 61% AUM from top-100 funds

Institutional Sentiment Summary — MLPA

Hedge Fund Ownership: MLPA

Market Analysis: MLPA

Analyst Price Targets

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Company Profile: MLPA

Is It Too Late to Buy Global X Fds (MLPA) Based on Hedge Fund 13F Filings?

Hedge Fund Positioning: MLPA

Statistics: MLPA

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Financial Highlights

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

Frequently Asked Questions — Global X Fds (MLPA)

Welcome to 13Foresight!