Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

NEWMONT CORP (NEM)

2K + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in NEM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +184
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
58%

Smart Money Signals — NEM

Based on 1601 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added NEM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
1,601 hedge funds hold NEM right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +51% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+542 new funds entered over the past year (+51% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 58% buying

917 buying664 selling
Last quarter: 917 funds bought or added vs 664 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+41 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new NEM position: 198 → 210 → 262 → 303. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

56% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 56% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 26% new
899 out of 1,601 hedge funds have held NEM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +22% but shares only +2% — price-driven

Value
+21%
Shares
+2%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +22%, but actual share count only changed +2%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

148 → 198 → 210 → 262 → 303 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 198 → 210 → 262 → 303. A growing number of institutions are discovering NEM each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Deep conviction — 62% of holders stayed 2+ years

■ 62% veterans ■ 9% 1-2yr ■ 29% new
Of 1,677 current holders: 1,048 (62%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆

Elite ownership — 50% AUM from top-100 funds

50% from top-100 AUM funds
44 of 1601 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 50% of total institutional value in NEM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.3
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.3/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — NEM

In 2025 Q4, 917 hedge funds were net buyers of NEM (303 opened a new position, 614 added to an existing one), while 664 reduced or exited (545 trimmed, 119 sold completely) — a 58% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 50% of total institutional value in NEM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +184 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 1601.

Hedge Fund Ownership: NEM

How many hedge funds hold NEM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of NEM vs. share price

Market Analysis: NEM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: NEM

Basic Materials Gold

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Smart Money Signal ?
Strong Institutional Conviction

Multiple high-quality funds hold meaningful positions with strong conviction.

154 top-rated funds 42 high-conviction
Consensus
9.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
6.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: NEM
2026 Q1 Stats Unlock in 5 days 2K + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in NEM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2025 Q4) Prior (2025 Q3) Change
Funds Holding 1677 1496 12.1%
13F Shares 876M 856M 2.24%
Total Value $86.91B $71.49B 21.57%
New Positions 307 264 +43
Increased Positions 692 662 +30
Closed Positions 128 92 +36
Reduced Positions 679 568 +111
Total Calls 42 48 -12.5%
Total Puts 39 42 -7.14%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.93 0.88 Neutral

Statistics: NEM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

2K + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in NEM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

Top 25 institutional holders of NEM — 2025 Q4 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Towarzystwo Funduszy Inwestycyjnych Allianz Polska S.A. 10.81% 56,080 $6.1M
2 Drum Hill Capital, LLC 8.00% 80,460 $8.7M
3 COLRAIN CAPITAL LLC 7.90% 188,845 $20.4M
4 MUHLENKAMP & CO INC 6.59% 231,182 $25.0M
5 FOUNDATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC 6.10% 500,734 $54.2M
6 Lesa Sroufe & Co 6.00% 81,467 $9K
7 WILKINS INVESTMENT COUNSEL INC 5.87% 378,630 $41.0M
8 Randolph Co Inc 5.06% 489,198 $53.0M
9 Compound Global Advisors, LLC 4.70% 1,400 $152K
10 MCINTYRE FREEDMAN & FLYNN INVESTMENT ADVISERS INC 4.50% 73,317 $7.9M
11 ARS Investment Partners, LLC 4.47% 795,271 $86.1M
12 Royal Palms Capital LLC 4.46% 41,579 $4.5M
13 Ridge Creek Global, Inc 4.43% 48,275 $5.2M
14 Gemsstock Ltd. 4.26% 373,315 $40.4M
15 Glass Wealth Management Co LLC 4.18% 99,611 $10.8M
16 Blue Whale Capital LLP 3.95% 766,471 $83.0M
17 Grand Central Investment Group 3.75% 46,810 $5.1M
18 MARVIN & PALMER ASSOCIATES INC 3.64% 28,090 $3.0M
19 Oppenheimer & Close, LLC 3.49% 51,189 $5.5M
20 SEAVIEW INVESTMENT MANAGERS LLC 3.40% 87,023 $9.4M
21 O'Domhnaill Enterprises, Inc. 3.35% 38,352 $4.2M
22 Minneapolis Portfolio Management Group, LLC 3.33% 289,711 $31.4M
23 Dorsey Wright & Associates 3.24% 241,350 $26.1M
24 Bruce & Co., Inc. 3.10% 100,000 $10.8M
25 Koa Wealth Management, LLC 3.07% 39,259 $4.2M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — NEWMONT CORP (NEM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for NEM?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added NEM than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for NEM?

Slight buying edge — 58% buying: Last quarter: 917 funds bought or added vs 664 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for NEM holders?

Elite ownership — 50% AUM from top-100 funds: 44 of 1601 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 50% of total institutional value in NEM. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held NEM?

56% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 899 out of 1,601 hedge funds have held NEM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.