Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Nano Dimension Ltd (NNDM)

104 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in NNDM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -4
Streak
5Q ▼
Buyers last Q
42%

Smart Money Signals — NNDM

Based on 108 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 5 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their NNDM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 75% of 3.0Y peak

75% of all-time peak
108 funds currently hold this stock — 75% of the 3.0-year high of 144 funds (reached 2024 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 22% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
30 fewer hedge funds hold NNDM compared to a year ago (-22% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying

39 buying54 selling
Last quarter: 54 funds reduced or exited vs 39 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 21 → 14 → 22 → 16. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

57% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 57% conviction (2yr+) ■ 25% medium ■ 18% new
62 out of 108 hedge funds have held NNDM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~16 new funds/quarter

31 → 21 → 14 → 22 → 16 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 21 → 14 → 22 → 16. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 65% veterans vs 21% newcomers

■ 65% veterans ■ 14% 1-2yr ■ 21% new
Entry-cohort mix of 114 holders: 74 (65%) are 2+ year veterans, 16 entered 1–2 years ago, and 24 (21%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 38% AUM from major funds

38% from top-100 AUM funds
21 of 106 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 38% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
2.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — NNDM

In 2026 Q1, 39 hedge funds were net buyers of NNDM (16 opened a new position, 23 added to an existing one), while 54 reduced or exited (34 trimmed, 20 sold completely) — a 42% buyer ratio, indicating roughly balanced activity. This extends a 5-quarter selling streak, suggesting sustained institutional caution. 38% of total institutional value in NNDM is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -4 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 108.

Hedge Fund Ownership: NNDM

How many hedge funds hold NNDM — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of NNDM vs. share price

Market Analysis: NNDM

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: NNDM

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

6 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
3.7
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.9
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: NNDM
104 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in NNDM. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 104 108 -3.7%
13F Shares 77M 66M 16.86%
Total Value $111M $112M -0.57%
New Positions 24 16 +8
Increased Positions 26 21 +5
Closed Positions 27 20 +7
Reduced Positions 25 34 -9
Total Calls 5 5 -
Total Puts 3 3 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.6 0.6 Bullish

Statistics: NNDM

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

104 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in NNDM. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 NNDM holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Murchinson Ltd. 3.77% 18,836,276 $27.3M
2 Peapod Lane Capital LLC 1.42% 1,451,728 $2.1M
3 Tang Capital Management LLC 0.94% 14,292,813 $20.7M
4 Gem Investment Advisors, LLC 0.89% 1,000,000 $1.4M
5 Steel Partners Holdings L.P. 0.87% 469,377 $681K
6 Boothbay Fund Management, LLC 0.18% 9,418,138 $13.7M
7 MYDA Advisors LLC 0.05% 210,251 $305K
8 Marquette Asset Management, LLC 0.04% 199,356 $289K
9 Bard Associates Inc 0.03% 87,500 $127K
10 Tactive Advisors, LLC 0.02% 52,429 $76K
11 Caption Management, LLC 0.02% 2,499,300 $3.6M
12 Anchyra Partners LLC 0.02% 44,935 $65K
13 EntryPoint Capital, LLC 0.02% 10,022 $22K
14 Pingora Partners LLC 0.01% 14,000 $20K
15 ARK Investment Management LLC 0.01% 1,247,498 $1.8M
16 DKM Wealth Management, Inc. 0.01% 10,000 $14K
17 Caption Management, LLC 0.01% 1,250,000 $1.8M
18 Financially Speaking Inc 0.01% 1,000 $2K
19 Man Group plc 0.01% 3,347,937 $4.9M
20 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 3,136,735 $4.5M
21 Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC 0.00% 126,012 $183K
22 Caption Management, LLC 0.00% 475,000 $689K
23 Quadrature Capital Ltd 0.00% 232,298 $337K
24 Clearwater Capital Advisors, LLC 0.00% 26,353 $38K
25 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 146,893 $213K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Nano Dimension Ltd (NNDM)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for NNDM?

Selling streak — 5 quarters in a row: For 5 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their NNDM positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for NNDM?

More sellers than buyers — 42% buying: Last quarter: 54 funds reduced or exited vs 39 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.

What is the fund quality score for NNDM holders?

Strong quality — 38% AUM from major funds: 21 of 106 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 38% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held NNDM?

57% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 62 out of 108 hedge funds have held NNDM for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →