Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

ACCENDRA HEALTH INC (OMI)

139 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in OMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -32
Streak
3Q ▼
Buyers last Q
38%

Smart Money Signals — OMI

Based on 167 hedge funds · latest filing: 2025 Q4 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their OMI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 70% of 3.0Y peak

70% of all-time peak
167 funds currently hold this stock — 70% of the 3.0-year high of 240 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 15% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
29 fewer hedge funds hold OMI compared to a year ago (-15% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 38% buying

81 buying130 selling
Last quarter: 130 funds sold vs only 81 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
⚠️

Fewer new buyers each quarter (-6 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 65 → 34 → 32 → 26. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
🔒

68% of holders stayed for 2+ years

68% conviction (2yr+) 19% medium 13% new
114 out of 167 hedge funds have held OMI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -5%, value -44%

Value
-44%
Shares
-4%
Last quarter: funds added -5% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -44%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

27 → 65 → 34 → 32 → 26 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 65 → 34 → 32 → 26. OMI is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Deep conviction — 74% of holders stayed 2+ years

74% veterans 8% 1-2yr 17% new
Of 178 current holders: 132 (74%) have held for over 2 years without selling. These are not momentum buyers — they have lived through drawdowns and stayed. A large veteran base acts as a stabilizing force during selloffs.
🏆

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds

47% from top-100 AUM funds
40 of 167 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in OMI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.4
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.4/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — OMI

In 2025 Q4, 81 hedge funds were net buyers of OMI (26 opened a new position, 55 added to an existing one), while 130 reduced or exited (72 trimmed, 58 sold completely) — a 38% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. This extends a 3-quarter selling streak, suggesting sustained institutional caution. 47% of total institutional value in OMI is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -32 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 167.

Hedge Fund Ownership: OMI

How many hedge funds hold OMI — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of OMI vs. share price

Market Analysis: OMI

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: OMI

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

14 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
5.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.3
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: OMI
139 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in OMI. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 139 167 -16.77%
13F Shares 64M 70M -8.36%
Total Value $145M $198M -26.41%
New Positions 26 26 -
Increased Positions 37 52 -15
Closed Positions 54 58 -4
Reduced Positions 50 69 -19
Total Calls 4 5 -20.0%
Total Puts 2 6 -66.67%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 1.2 Bullish

Statistics: OMI

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q1)

139 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in OMI. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 institutional holders of OMI — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Coliseum Capital Management, LLC 2.45% 13,100,807 $29.9M
2 Kennondale Capital Management LLC 0.37% 225,890 $515K
3 Invenomic Capital Management LP 0.35% 3,368,975 $7.7M
4 PARADIGM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC/NY 0.16% 1,786,400 $4.1M
5 Williams & Novak, LLC 0.11% 57,710 $143K
6 Massar Capital Management, LP 0.10% 421,120 $960K
7 Dana Investment Advisors, Inc. 0.10% 1,485,097 $3.4M
8 Nebula Research & Development LLC 0.09% 122,539 $1.1M
9 Nierenberg Investment Management Company, LLC 0.06% 50,000 $114K
10 Linden Thomas Advisory Services, LLC 0.05% 240,379 $548K
11 State of Wyoming 0.05% 168,850 $385K
12 Nierenberg Investment Management Company, LLC 0.03% 27,555 $63K
13 DoubleLine ETF Adviser LP 0.02% 24,287 $55K
14 LaSalle St. Investment Advisors, LLC 0.02% 61,000 $139K
15 WOLVERINE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 0.02% 695,415 $1.6M
16 Global Assets Advisory, LLC 0.01% 329 $36K
17 Abel Hall, LLC 0.01% 19,512 $44K
18 NINE MASTS CAPITAL Ltd 0.01% 22,373 $51K
19 Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 0.01% 1,380,728 $3.1M
20 Plancorp, LLC 0.01% 81,666 $229K
21 XTX Topco Ltd 0.01% 161,602 $368K
22 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 0.01% 93,458 $213K
23 MILESTONE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC 0.01% 12,000 $27K
24 Pekin Hardy Strauss, Inc. 0.00% 20,000 $46K
25 D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. 0.00% 3,311,601 $7.6M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — ACCENDRA HEALTH INC (OMI)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for OMI?

Selling streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their OMI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for OMI?

Heavy selling pressure — only 38% buying: Last quarter: 130 funds sold vs only 81 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for OMI holders?

Elite ownership — 47% AUM from top-100 funds: 40 of 167 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 47% of total institutional value in OMI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held OMI?

68% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 114 out of 167 hedge funds have held OMI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →