Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Onewater Marine Inc (ONEW)

94 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in ONEW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +7
Streak
2Q ▲
Buyers last Q
56%

Smart Money Signals — ONEW

Based on 97 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ONEW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
97 hedge funds hold ONEW right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +9% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+8 new funds entered over the past year (+9% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction. The peak was reached in just 2 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 56% buying

52 buying41 selling
Last quarter: 52 funds bought or added vs 41 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~18 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 16 → 10 → 18 → 18. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 54% conviction (2yr+) ■ 19% medium ■ 28% new
52 out of 97 hedge funds have held ONEW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +19% but shares only +0% — price-driven

Value
+19%
Shares
+0%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +19%, but actual share count only changed +0%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

8 → 16 → 10 → 18 → 18 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 16 → 10 → 18 → 18. A growing number of institutions are discovering ONEW each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 60% veterans vs 24% newcomers

■ 60% veterans ■ 16% 1-2yr ■ 24% new
Entry-cohort mix of 99 holders: 59 (60%) are 2+ year veterans, 16 entered 1–2 years ago, and 24 (24%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds

51% from top-100 AUM funds
32 of 95 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in ONEW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — ONEW

In 2026 Q2, 52 hedge funds were net buyers of ONEW (18 opened a new position, 34 added to an existing one), while 41 reduced or exited (30 trimmed, 11 sold completely) — a 56% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. Net buying has persisted for two consecutive quarters, a positive momentum signal. 51% of total institutional value in ONEW is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +7 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 97.

Hedge Fund Ownership: ONEW

How many hedge funds hold ONEW — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of ONEW vs. share price

Market Analysis: ONEW

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: ONEW

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

8 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: ONEW
94 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in ONEW. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 94 90 4.44%
13F Shares 12M 12M 0.02%
Total Value $130M $109M 18.94%
New Positions 18 18 -
Increased Positions 34 34 -
Closed Positions 12 16 -4
Reduced Positions 28 22 +6
Total Calls 2 0 100%
Total Puts 2 2 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 1.0 0.0 Neutral

Statistics: ONEW

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

94 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in ONEW. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 ONEW holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 General Equity Holdings LP 4.27% 634,421 $7.1M
2 Private Management Group Inc 0.14% 477,506 $5.4M
3 Gilder Gagnon Howe & Co LLC 0.09% 791,375 $8.9M
4 R Squared Ltd 0.07% 12,162 $137K
5 Shellback Capital, LP 0.07% 70,659 $796K
6 Royce & Associates LP 0.05% 563,335 $6.3M
7 Divisadero Street Capital Management, LP 0.04% 143,755 $1.6M
8 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.02% 116,435 $1.3M
9 First Eagle Investment Management, LLC 0.01% 757,668 $8.5M
10 Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management LLC 0.01% 382,682 $4.3M
11 American Century Companies Inc 0.01% 2,153,219 $24.3M
12 Allied Private Wealth LLC 0.01% 730 $8K
13 XTX Topco Ltd 0.00% 28,524 $321K
14 Bfsg, LLC 0.00% 3,990 $45K
15 Retirement Systems of Alabama 0.00% 116,839 $1.3M
16 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 0.00% 17,530 $198K
17 Susquehanna Portfolio Strategies, LLC 0.00% 18,925 $213K
18 Empowered Funds, LLC 0.00% 56,235 $634K
19 Man Group plc 0.00% 104,887 $1.2M
20 Ameriprise Financial Inc 0.00% 717,314 $8.1M
21 Tudor Investment Corp Et Al 0.00% 97,848 $1.1M
22 Marshall Wace, LLP 0.00% 128,856 $1.5M
23 Russell Investments Group, Ltd. 0.00% 106,055 $1.2M
24 Brevan Howard Capital Management LP 0.00% 10,630 $120K
25 Quantinno Capital Management LP 0.00% 65,353 $737K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Onewater Marine Inc (ONEW)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for ONEW?

Buying streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added ONEW than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for ONEW?

Slight buying edge — 56% buying: Last quarter: 52 funds bought or added vs 41 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for ONEW holders?

Elite ownership — 51% AUM from top-100 funds: 32 of 95 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 51% of total institutional value in ONEW. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held ONEW?

54% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 52 out of 97 hedge funds have held ONEW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →