Based on 86 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their OXLC positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 60% of 3.0Y high
60% of all-time peak
Only 86 funds hold OXLC today versus a peak of 143 funds at 2024 Q4 — just 60% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 37% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
51 fewer hedge funds hold OXLC compared to a year ago (-37% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 45% buying
53 buying64 selling
Last quarter: 64 funds reduced or exited vs 53 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
⚠️
Fewer new buyers each quarter (-20 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 30 → 25 → 38 → 18. Each quarter fewer new institutions are entering. This usually means most funds that wanted in are already in — the stock is well-known but the pool of potential new buyers is shrinking.
📌
Mixed — 37% long-term, 35% new
■ 37% conviction (2yr+)
■ 28% medium
■ 35% new
Of the 86 current holders: 32 (37%) held >2 years, 24 held 1–2 years, and 30 entered in the last year. A mixed base — the stock has long-term believers but also recent buyers who haven't been tested by a downturn yet.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares +66%, value +11%
Last quarter: funds added +66% more shares while total portfolio value only changed +11%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~18 new funds/quarter
27 → 30 → 25 → 38 → 18 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 30 → 25 → 38 → 18. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 42% veterans vs 38% newcomers
■ 42% veterans
■ 20% 1-2yr
■ 38% new
Entry-cohort mix of 86 holders: 36 (42%) are 2+ year veterans, 17 entered 1–2 years ago, and 33 (38%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 34% AUM from major funds
34% from top-100 AUM funds
12 of 86 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 34% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.