Based on 127 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their PNQI positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 88% of 3.0Y peak
88% of all-time peak
127 funds currently hold this stock — 88% of the 3.0-year high of 144 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding PNQI is almost the same as a year ago (+2 funds, +2% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🔴
Heavy selling pressure — only 24% buying
28 buying87 selling
Last quarter: 87 funds sold vs only 28 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~13 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 17 → 14 → 14 → 13. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
63% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 63% conviction (2yr+)
■ 20% medium
■ 17% new
80 out of 127 hedge funds have held PNQI for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~13 new funds/quarter
15 → 17 → 14 → 14 → 13 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 17 → 14 → 14 → 13. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 64% veterans vs 23% newcomers
■ 64% veterans
■ 13% 1-2yr
■ 23% new
Entry-cohort mix of 127 holders: 81 (64%) are 2+ year veterans, 17 entered 1–2 years ago, and 29 (23%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆
Elite ownership — 78% AUM from top-100 funds
78% from top-100 AUM funds
20 of 127 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 78% of total institutional value in PNQI. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
4.1
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.1/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.