Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Portland Gen Elec Co (POR)

493 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in POR. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +42
Streak
3Q ▲
Buyers last Q
64%

Smart Money Signals — POR

Based on 502 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added POR than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
502 hedge funds hold POR right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +13% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+58 new funds entered over the past year (+13% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 64% buying

302 buying172 selling
Last quarter: 302 funds were net buyers (91 opened a brand new position + 211 added to an existing one). Only 172 were sellers (123 trimmed + 49 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+7 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new POR position: 42 → 68 → 84 → 91. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 63% conviction (2yr+) ■ 18% medium ■ 20% new
315 out of 502 hedge funds have held POR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

57 → 42 → 68 → 84 → 91 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 42 → 68 → 84 → 91. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 69% veterans vs 21% newcomers

■ 69% veterans ■ 9% 1-2yr ■ 21% new
Entry-cohort mix of 507 holders: 350 (69%) are 2+ year veterans, 48 entered 1–2 years ago, and 109 (21%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 62% AUM from top-100 funds

62% from top-100 AUM funds
56 of 501 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 62% of total institutional value in POR. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.7
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.7/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — POR

In 2026 Q1, 302 hedge funds were net buyers of POR (91 opened a new position, 211 added to an existing one), while 172 reduced or exited (123 trimmed, 49 sold completely) — a 64% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 3 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 62% of total institutional value in POR is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +42 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 502.

Hedge Fund Ownership: POR

How many hedge funds hold POR — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of POR vs. share price

Market Analysis: POR

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: POR

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

30 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
6.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
2.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: POR
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 1 days 493 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in POR. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 493 458 7.64%
13F Shares 118M 111M 6.63%
Total Value $5.91B $5.30B 11.49%
New Positions 87 84 +3
Increased Positions 211 176 +35
Closed Positions 52 53 -1
Reduced Positions 118 136 -18
Total Calls 4 5 -20.0%
Total Puts 2 4 -50.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 0.8 Bullish

Statistics: POR

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

493 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in POR. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 POR holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC 6.06% 2,133,988 $110.6M
2 Longboard Asset Management, LP 3.39% 3,904 $202K
3 Nuance Investments, LLC 2.42% 274,376 $14.2M
4 Martin Capital Partners, LLC 2.07% 108,542 $5.6M
5 Dean Capital Management 1.75% 93,019 $4.8M
6 John G Ullman & Associates Inc 1.28% 202,882 $10.5M
7 Moody Aldrich Partners LLC 1.10% 118,329 $6.1M
8 Dean Investment Associates, LLC 0.87% 128,069 $6.6M
9 Broadwater Capital Management LLC 0.84% 23,314 $1.1M
10 Systematic Financial Management LP 0.73% 711,771 $36.9M
11 DC Investments Management, LLC 0.72% 40,750 $2.1M
12 Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC 0.63% 91,466 $4.7M
13 Icon Advisers Inc/Co 0.59% 60,266 $3.1M
14 Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, INC. 0.54% 3,841,325 $199.1M
15 Leeward Investments, LLC - MA 0.54% 228,786 $11.9M
16 Algert Global LLC 0.39% 637,692 $33.1M
17 Carrera Capital Advisors 0.39% 50,174 $2.6M
18 Chelsea Counsel Co 0.34% 15,300 $801K
19 Bank & Trust Co 0.33% 10,115 $524K
20 Wedge Capital Management L L P/Nc 0.32% 377,171 $19.5M
21 Soros Fund Management LLC 0.32% 500,000 $25.9M
22 Michels Family Financial, LLC 0.29% 8,761 $454K
23 Sciencast Management LP 0.28% 25,600 $1.3M
24 Clearbridge Investments, LLC 0.27% 6,363,146 $329.8M
25 1834 Investment Advisors Co 0.26% 44,581 $2.3M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Portland Gen Elec Co (POR)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for POR?

Buying streak — 3 quarters in a row: For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added POR than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for POR?

More buyers than sellers — 64% buying: Last quarter: 302 funds were net buyers (91 opened a brand new position + 211 added to an existing one). Only 172 were sellers (123 trimmed + 49 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for POR holders?

Elite ownership — 62% AUM from top-100 funds: 56 of 501 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 62% of total institutional value in POR. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held POR?

63% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 315 out of 502 hedge funds have held POR for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →