Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Pattern Group Inc (PTRN)

141 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in PTRN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +57
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
74%

Smart Money Signals — PTRN

Based on 142 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PTRN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
142 hedge funds hold PTRN right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +14100% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+141 new funds entered over the past year (+14100% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 74% buying

118 buying42 selling
Last quarter: 118 funds were net buyers (77 opened a brand new position + 41 added to an existing one). Only 42 were sellers (22 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+44 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new PTRN position: 67 → 33 → 33 → 77. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 78% entered in last year

1% conviction (2yr+) 20% medium 78% new
Only 2 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
💰

Value +159% but shares only +26% — price-driven

Value
+158%
Shares
+26%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +159%, but actual share count only changed +26%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~77 new funds/quarter

0 → 67 → 33 → 33 → 77 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 67 → 33 → 33 → 77. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🌱

Early stage — 99% of holders entered in last year

1% veterans 0% 1-2yr 99% new
Of 147 current holders: 145 (99%) entered in the past year, only 2 (1%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds

29% from top-100 AUM funds
43 of 142 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
7.0
out of 10
High Exit Risk
Exit risk score 7.0/10 — multiple crowding signals converge. Institutional ownership is at 100% of its all-time high — near peak crowding. Crowded trades can unwind fast — a single catalyst can trigger a cascade.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — PTRN

In 2026 Q2, 118 hedge funds were net buyers of PTRN (77 opened a new position, 41 added to an existing one), while 42 reduced or exited (22 trimmed, 20 sold completely) — a 74% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 29% of total institutional value in PTRN is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +57 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 142.

Hedge Fund Ownership: PTRN

How many hedge funds hold PTRN — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of PTRN vs. share price

Market Analysis: PTRN

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: PTRN

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

7 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
3.9
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: PTRN
141 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in PTRN. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 141 85 65.88%
13F Shares 64M 51M 26.07%
Total Value $1.56B $602M 158.47%
New Positions 76 33 +43
Increased Positions 40 29 +11
Closed Positions 20 25 -5
Reduced Positions 20 14 +6
Total Calls 3 4 -25.0%
Total Puts 2 1 100.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.67 0.25 Bullish

Statistics: PTRN

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

141 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in PTRN. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 PTRN holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Knox Lane LP 100.00% 18,976,542 $478.0M
2 Monashee Investment Management LLC 2.71% 64,039 $1.6M
3 G2 Investment Partners Management LLC 1.72% 375,045 $9.4M
4 Scientech Research LLC 1.02% 49,870 $1.3M
5 1492 Capital Management LLC 0.57% 77,109 $1.9M
6 Wasatch Advisors LP 0.52% 3,135,129 $79.0M
7 Sylebra Capital LLC 0.45% 168,581 $4.2M
8 Occudo Quantitative Strategies LP 0.44% 326,256 $8.2M
9 Jacobs Equity LLC 0.36% 20,634 $520K
10 Copia Wealth Management 0.32% 21,428 $540K
11 Gilder Gagnon Howe & Co LLC 0.24% 928,703 $23.4M
12 Burkehill Global Management, LP 0.23% 250,000 $6.3M
13 Ghisallo Capital Management LLC 0.19% 380,000 $9.6M
14 Readystate Asset Management LP 0.18% 212,964 $5.4M
15 Seven Grand Managers, LLC 0.15% 150,000 $3.8M
16 Aquatic Capital Management LLC 0.14% 161,610 $4.1M
17 Summit Partners Public Asset Management, LLC 0.14% 313,477 $7.9M
18 Westfield Capital Management Co LP 0.14% 1,656,169 $41.7M
19 Voleon Capital Management LP 0.13% 278,372 $7.0M
20 Alyeska Investment Group, L.P. 0.11% 1,766,546 $44.5M
21 Drive Wealth Management, LLC 0.09% 20,408 $514K
22 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.09% 969,390 $24.4M
23 Numerai GP LLC 0.08% 37,026 $933K
24 Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC 0.07% 1,808,382 $47.9M
25 Loomis Sayles & Co L P 0.06% 1,978,332 $49.8M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Pattern Group Inc (PTRN)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for PTRN?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added PTRN than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for PTRN?

More buyers than sellers — 74% buying: Last quarter: 118 funds were net buyers (77 opened a brand new position + 41 added to an existing one). Only 42 were sellers (22 trimmed + 20 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for PTRN holders?

Strong quality — 29% AUM from major funds: 43 of 142 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 29% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held PTRN?

Mostly new holders — 78% entered in last year: Only 2 funds (1%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →