Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

High Templar Technology Ltd (QD)

42 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in QD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -3
Streak
2Q ▼
Buyers last Q
29%

Smart Money Signals — QD

Based on 42 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their QD positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊

High ownership — 76% of 3.0Y peak

76% of all-time peak
42 funds currently hold this stock — 76% of the 3.0-year high of 55 funds (reached 2025 Q4). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 14% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
7 fewer hedge funds hold QD compared to a year ago (-14% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 29% buying

14 buying34 selling
Last quarter: 34 funds sold vs only 14 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~9 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 8 → 10 → 6 → 9. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

69% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 69% conviction (2yr+) ■ 14% medium ■ 17% new
29 out of 42 hedge funds have held QD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
📊

Peak discovery — momentum slowing

5 → 8 → 10 → 6 → 9 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 8 → 10 → 6 → 9. QD is well-known in the hedge fund world, but fresh entries are gradually declining. The explosive phase of institutional discovery is likely behind us.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 78% veterans vs 18% newcomers

■ 78% veterans ■ 4% 1-2yr ■ 18% new
Entry-cohort mix of 45 holders: 35 (78%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 8 (18%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 59% AUM from top-100 funds

59% from top-100 AUM funds
16 of 42 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 59% of total institutional value in QD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.3
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.3/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — QD

In 2026 Q2, 14 hedge funds were net buyers of QD (9 opened a new position, 5 added to an existing one), while 34 reduced or exited (22 trimmed, 12 sold completely) — a 29% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net selling has persisted for two consecutive quarters. 59% of total institutional value in QD is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: -3 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 42.

Hedge Fund Ownership: QD

How many hedge funds hold QD — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of QD vs. share price

Market Analysis: QD

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: QD

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

2 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
2.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: QD
42 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in QD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 42 45 -6.67%
13F Shares 10M 21M -54.64%
Total Value $17M $34M -49.31%
New Positions 9 6 +3
Increased Positions 5 8 -3
Closed Positions 12 16 -4
Reduced Positions 21 20 +1
Total Calls 2 2 -
Total Puts 1 1 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 0.5 Bullish

Statistics: QD

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

42 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in QD. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 QD holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Taikang Asset Management (Hong Kong) Co Ltd 0.30% 1,300,000 $3.3M
2 E Fund Management (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. 0.26% 305,170 $781K
3 E Fund Management Co., Ltd. 0.02% 305,170 $781K
4 SmartHarvest Portfolios, LLC 0.01% 15,342 $39K
5 Oasis Management Co Ltd. 0.00% 27,775 $71K
6 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Empls Retrmt Sys 0.00% 203,829 $522K
7 SBI Securities Co., Ltd. 0.00% 23,320 $60K
8 Police & Firemen's Retirement System of New Jersey 0.00% 56,308 $144K
9 Root Financial Partners, LLC 0.00% 10,550 $27K
10 Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio 0.00% 97,048 $248K
11 UBS Group AG 0.00% 1,991,699 $5.1M
12 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.00% 143,213 $367K
13 Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) 0.00% 3,367 $9K
14 Two Sigma Investments, LP 0.00% 95,321 $244K
15 Nomura Holdings Inc 0.00% 57,142 $146K
16 Point72 Asset Management, L.P. 0.00% 39,075 $100K
17 Hrt Financial LP 0.00% 22,266 $57K
18 LMR Partners LLP 0.00% 10,446 $27K
19 Sei Investments Co 0.00% 40,274 $103K
20 BNP Paribas Financial Markets 0.00% 66,701 $171K
21 American Century Companies Inc 0.00% 51,105 $131K
22 Signaturefd, LLC 0.00% 1,659 $4K
23 Stifel Financial Corp 0.00% 20,000 $51K
24 Morgan Stanley 0.00% 163,702 $419K
25 Group One Trading LLC 0.00% 5,527 $14K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — High Templar Technology Ltd (QD)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for QD?

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their QD positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for QD?

Heavy selling pressure — only 29% buying: Last quarter: 34 funds sold vs only 14 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for QD holders?

Elite ownership — 59% AUM from top-100 funds: 16 of 42 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 59% of total institutional value in QD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held QD?

69% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 29 out of 42 hedge funds have held QD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →