Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

First Tr Exchng Traded Fd VI (QMAG)

46 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in QMAG. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↓ -1
Streak
2Q ▼
Buyers last Q
37%

Smart Money Signals — QMAG

Based on 46 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📉

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their QMAG positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (96% of max)

96% of all-time peak
46 hedge funds hold QMAG right now — the highest count in 2.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +119% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+25 new funds entered over the past year (+119% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks. The peak was reached in just 4 quarters from the low — a sharp move.
🔴

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying

14 buying24 selling
Last quarter: 24 funds sold vs only 14 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~7 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 20 → 14 → 4 → 7. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔄

Mostly new holders — 35% entered in last year

■ 0% conviction (2yr+) ■ 65% medium ■ 35% new
Only 0 funds (0%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.
⚠️

Saturation — most institutions already know this story

1 → 20 → 14 → 4 → 7 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 20 → 14 → 4 → 7. Far fewer institutions are entering now vs. a year ago. When the pool of potential new buyers shrinks this fast, future price support from institutional inflows weakens significantly.
🌱

Early stage — 57% of holders entered in last year

■ 0% veterans ■ 43% 1-2yr ■ 57% new
Of 46 current holders: 26 (57%) entered in the past year, only 0 (0%) are 2+ year veterans. This is an early-phase institutional idea — still being discovered. High upside potential if the thesis plays out, but thin conviction base.
📋

Smaller funds dominant — 7% AUM from top-100

7% from top-100 AUM funds
4 of 46 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 7% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
4.9
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.9/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — QMAG

In 2026 Q2, 14 hedge funds were net buyers of QMAG (7 opened a new position, 7 added to an existing one), while 24 reduced or exited (16 trimmed, 8 sold completely) — a 37% buyer ratio, indicating net institutional distribution. Net selling has persisted for two consecutive quarters. Net fund flow last quarter: -1 funds (more exits than new entries). Total institutional holders: 46.

Hedge Fund Ownership: QMAG

How many hedge funds hold QMAG — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of QMAG vs. share price

Market Analysis: QMAG

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: QMAG

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

1 top-rated funds 0 high-conviction
Consensus
1.3
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
0.5
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: QMAG
46 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in QMAG. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 46 47 -2.13%
13F Shares 1M 1M -22.28%
Total Value $26M $29M -13.24%
New Positions 7 4 +3
Increased Positions 7 7 -
Closed Positions 8 5 +3
Reduced Positions 16 23 -7
Total Calls 0 0 -
Total Puts 0 0 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.0 0.0 Bullish

Statistics: QMAG

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

46 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in QMAG. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 QMAG holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Sacks & Associates, LLC 0.60% 35,074 $893K
2 LexAurum Advisors, LLC 0.55% 186,913 $4.7M
3 Frederick Financial Consultants, LLC 0.48% 44,220 $1.1M
4 Mission Financial Group, LLC 0.30% 14,362 $364K
5 Grantvest Financial Group LLC 0.30% 20,532 $520K
6 Sequent Planning LLC 0.29% 52,839 $1.3M
7 Ignite Planners, LLC 0.10% 28,987 $735K
8 Uptick Partners, LLC 0.07% 18,976 $481K
9 Diligent Investors, LLC 0.07% 12,683 $322K
10 Synergy Asset Management, LLC 0.04% 15,703 $398K
11 DHJJ Financial Advisors, Ltd. 0.03% 3,885 $98K
12 Topsail Wealth Management, LLC 0.02% 6,530 $166K
13 Benson Wealth Management INC 0.02% 824 $21K
14 Noble Wealth Management PBC 0.02% 1,850 $47K
15 Old Mission Capital LLC 0.01% 31,724 $804K
16 Money Concepts Capital Corp 0.01% 10,850 $275K
17 Integrity Alliance, LLC. 0.01% 9,982 $253K
18 Ameritas Advisory Services, LLC 0.01% 14,813 $376K
19 Summit Financial, LLC 0.01% 24,870 $630K
20 Apollon Wealth Management, LLC 0.01% 16,494 $418K
21 Savvy Advisors, Inc. 0.00% 9,227 $234K
22 Independent Financial Group, LLC 0.00% 9,679 $245K
23 Centaurus Financial, INC. 0.00% 4,666 $118K
24 Great Valley Advisor Group, INC. 0.00% 9,535 $242K
25 Kestra Advisory Services, LLC 0.00% 42,880 $1.1M
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — First Tr Exchng Traded Fd VI (QMAG)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for QMAG?

Selling streak — 2 quarters in a row: For 2 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their QMAG positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.

What is the institutional breadth score for QMAG?

Heavy selling pressure — only 37% buying: Last quarter: 24 funds sold vs only 14 buyers. This is widespread institutional distribution — not a few funds rebalancing, but a broad exit. High conviction bearish signal.

What is the fund quality score for QMAG holders?

Smaller funds dominant — 7% AUM from top-100: 4 of 46 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 7% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.

How long have hedge funds held QMAG?

Mostly new holders — 35% entered in last year: Only 0 funds (0%) have held >2 years. The majority of current holders are relatively new to the position. New holders tend to sell faster when prices drop — a shallow conviction base that could amplify any sell-off.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →