Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Richardson Electrs Ltd (RELL)

113 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in RELL. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +17
Streak
4Q ▲
Buyers last Q
68%

Smart Money Signals — RELL

Based on 113 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row

last 6Q
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added RELL than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
113 hedge funds hold RELL right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
🚀

Fast accumulation — +36% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+30 new funds entered over the past year (+36% YoY). That's a rapid rush of institutional money. Fast accumulation often signals a major thesis — but it also means the stock could fall quickly if that thesis breaks.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 68% buying

71 buying33 selling
Last quarter: 71 funds were net buyers (24 opened a brand new position + 47 added to an existing one). Only 33 were sellers (26 trimmed + 7 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+8 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new RELL position: 11 → 15 → 16 → 24. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years

■ 55% conviction (2yr+) ■ 22% medium ■ 23% new
62 out of 113 hedge funds have held RELL for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +101% but shares only +17% — price-driven

Value
+100%
Shares
+17%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +101%, but actual share count only changed +17%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
🚀

Acceleration phase — new buyers rushing in

7 → 11 → 15 → 16 → 24 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 11 → 15 → 16 → 24. The pace of institutional discovery is accelerating sharply. This is the 'hot idea' phase — the thesis is being passed from fund to fund. You are not late — the accumulation wave is still building.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 66% veterans vs 25% newcomers

■ 66% veterans ■ 9% 1-2yr ■ 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 118 holders: 78 (66%) are 2+ year veterans, 11 entered 1–2 years ago, and 29 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅

Strong quality — 36% AUM from major funds

36% from top-100 AUM funds
34 of 113 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 36% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
4.0
out of 10
Moderate Exit Risk
Exit risk score 4.0/10 — some crowding factors present, but no critical concentration. Watch ownership trend over the next 1–2 quarters for direction.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — RELL

In 2026 Q2, 71 hedge funds were net buyers of RELL (24 opened a new position, 47 added to an existing one), while 33 reduced or exited (26 trimmed, 7 sold completely) — a 68% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. This marks 4 consecutive quarters of net institutional buying — a persistent conviction signal. 36% of total institutional value in RELL is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting strong institutional quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +17 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 113.

Hedge Fund Ownership: RELL

How many hedge funds hold RELL — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of RELL vs. share price

Market Analysis: RELL

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: RELL

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

10 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
4.5
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.0
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: RELL
113 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in RELL. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 113 96 17.71%
13F Shares 10M 9M 16.98%
Total Value $190M $95M 100.62%
New Positions 24 16 +8
Increased Positions 48 36 +12
Closed Positions 7 13 -6
Reduced Positions 23 22 +1
Total Calls 3 2 50.0%
Total Puts 2 2 -
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.67 1.0 Bullish

Statistics: RELL

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

113 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in RELL. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 RELL holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 First Wilshire Securities Management Inc 2.51% 642,356 $12.2M
2 Aldebaran Capital, LLC 1.34% 93,969 $1.8M
3 DDD Partners, LLC 1.32% 1,110,602 $21.1M
4 Mork Capital Management, LLC 1.22% 100,000 $1.9M
5 Annis Gardner Whiting Capital Advisors, LLC 0.29% 100,015 $1.9M
6 Nano Cap New Millennium Growth Fund L P 0.26% 17,500 $333K
7 AIGH Capital Management LLC 0.24% 200,434 $3.8M
8 Royce & Associates LP 0.22% 1,422,938 $27.1M
9 Parthenon LLC 0.19% 98,316 $1.9M
10 Brendel Financial Advisors LLC 0.19% 21,747 $413K
11 Informed Momentum Co LLC 0.11% 63,433 $1.2M
12 Aristides Capital LLC 0.10% 25,815 $491K
13 Potomac Capital Management, Inc. 0.06% 5,000 $95K
14 Founders Capital Management 0.05% 6,500 $124K
15 Essex Investment Management Co LLC 0.04% 16,018 $305K
16 ARS Investment Partners, LLC 0.03% 36,801 $700K
17 Bridgeway Capital Management, LLC 0.02% 68,674 $1.3M
18 Insight Wealth Strategies, LLC 0.02% 10,000 $188K
19 Granite Investment Partners, LLC 0.01% 13,069 $248K
20 Trexquant Investment LP 0.01% 111,336 $2.1M
21 Kovack Advisors, Inc. 0.01% 13,415 $252K
22 Occudo Quantitative Strategies LP 0.01% 11,508 $219K
23 Quinn Opportunity Partners LLC 0.01% 10,000 $190K
24 Renaissance Technologies LLC 0.01% 313,177 $6.0M
25 Ritholtz Wealth Management 0.01% 25,266 $480K
Investor Ownership
History 		% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Richardson Electrs Ltd (RELL)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for RELL?

Buying streak — 4 quarters in a row: For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds added RELL than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for RELL?

More buyers than sellers — 68% buying: Last quarter: 71 funds were net buyers (24 opened a brand new position + 47 added to an existing one). Only 33 were sellers (26 trimmed + 7 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for RELL holders?

Strong quality — 36% AUM from major funds: 34 of 113 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 36% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.

How long have hedge funds held RELL?

55% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 62 out of 113 hedge funds have held RELL for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →