Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Rapid7 Inc (RPD)

237 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in RPD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +14
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
55%

Smart Money Signals — RPD

Based on 239 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added RPD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
📊

High ownership — 82% of 3.0Y peak

82% of all-time peak
239 funds currently hold this stock — 82% of the 3.0-year high of 293 funds (reached 2024 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉

Outflows — 5% fewer funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
12 fewer hedge funds hold RPD compared to a year ago (-5% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟡

Slight buying edge — 55% buying

155 buying126 selling
Last quarter: 155 funds bought or added vs 126 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.
📈

More new buyers each quarter (+23 vs last Q)

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new RPD position: 39 → 39 → 45 → 68. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒

57% of holders stayed for 2+ years

57% conviction (2yr+) 16% medium 26% new
137 out of 239 hedge funds have held RPD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎

Buying through price weakness — shares -3%, value -67%

Value
-66%
Shares
-2%
Last quarter: funds added -3% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -67%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
📈

Growing discovery — still being found

41 → 39 → 39 → 45 → 68 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 39 → 39 → 45 → 68. A growing number of institutions are discovering RPD each quarter. The narrative is still spreading — leaving room for ongoing capital accumulation.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 66% veterans vs 25% newcomers

66% veterans 9% 1-2yr 25% new
Entry-cohort mix of 250 holders: 165 (66%) are 2+ year veterans, 23 entered 1–2 years ago, and 62 (25%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 45% AUM from top-100 funds

45% from top-100 AUM funds
47 of 238 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 45% of total institutional value in RPD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
2.8
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 2.8/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — RPD

In 2026 Q1, 155 hedge funds were net buyers of RPD (68 opened a new position, 87 added to an existing one), while 126 reduced or exited (72 trimmed, 54 sold completely) — a 55% buyer ratio, indicating a slight buying edge. 45% of total institutional value in RPD is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +14 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 239.

Hedge Fund Ownership: RPD

How many hedge funds hold RPD — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of RPD vs. share price

Market Analysis: RPD

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: RPD

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

21 top-rated funds 2 high-conviction
Consensus
5.8
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.2
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: RPD
2026 Q2 Stats Unlock in 1 days 237 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in RPD. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q1) Prior (2025 Q4) Change
Funds Holding 237 224 5.8%
13F Shares 63M 65M -2.74%
Total Value $327M $986M -66.84%
New Positions 67 45 +22
Increased Positions 83 88 -5
Closed Positions 54 52 +2
Reduced Positions 66 71 -5
Total Calls 8 9 -11.11%
Total Puts 4 7 -42.86%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.5 0.78 Bullish

Statistics: RPD

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

237 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in RPD. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
2026 Q2 filings are still coming in. Only funds that have filed so far are shown — top holders may not have reported yet. Full 13F data typically settles by ~50 days after quarter-end.
Top 25 RPD holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q1 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Circumference Group LLC 3.14% 178,543 $1.4M
2 JANA Partners Management, LP 2.87% 6,749,936 $54.7M
3 Rangeley Capital, LLC 1.06% 143,000 $1.2M
4 Nano Cap New Millennium Growth Fund L P 0.56% 90,000 $729K
5 Soviero Asset Management, LP 0.44% 130,000 $1.1M
6 IQ EQ FUND MANAGEMENT (IRELAND) Ltd 0.30% 575,643 $4.7M
7 Palogic Value Management, L.P. 0.28% 105,142 $852K
8 Quinn Opportunity Partners LLC 0.15% 387,897 $3.1M
9 Rangeley Capital, LLC 0.14% 18,700 $151K
10 Williams & Novak Wealth Management, LLC 0.13% 24,050 $195K
11 Atom Investors LP 0.11% 149,572 $1.2M
12 Susquehanna Fundamental Investments, LLC 0.06% 420,545 $3.4M
13 Green Alpha Advisors, LLC 0.06% 10,230 $83K
14 Inceptionr LLC 0.05% 25,725 $208K
15 Pale Fire Capital SE 0.05% 79,249 $642K
16 Voss Capital, LP 0.04% 100,000 $810K
17 Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC 0.04% 33,193 $269K
18 Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc 0.03% 1,190,571 $9.6M
19 Twelve Points Wealth Management LLC 0.03% 20,949 $170K
20 Acorn Financial Advisory Services Inc /Adv 0.03% 29,341 $238K
21 Drive Wealth Management, LLC 0.03% 18,254 $148K
22 State of Wyoming 0.03% 31,681 $257K
23 Engineers Gate Manager LP 0.03% 245,128 $2.0M
24 Centiva Capital, LP 0.03% 363,400 $2.9M
25 Fox Run Management, L.L.C. 0.02% 15,772 $128K
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Rapid7 Inc (RPD)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for RPD?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added RPD than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for RPD?

Slight buying edge — 55% buying: Last quarter: 155 funds bought or added vs 126 that reduced or exited. It's nearly a 50/50 split — some institutions are convinced, others are taking profits. This mixed picture is normal near price highs.

What is the fund quality score for RPD holders?

Elite ownership — 45% AUM from top-100 funds: 47 of 238 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 45% of total institutional value in RPD. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held RPD?

57% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 137 out of 239 hedge funds have held RPD for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →