Based on 11 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 1 quarter in a row
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds reduced or closed their RUMBW positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 65% of 3.0Y high
65% of all-time peak
Only 11 funds hold RUMBW today versus a peak of 17 funds at 2025 Q2 — just 65% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 35% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
6 fewer hedge funds hold RUMBW compared to a year ago (-35% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 67% buying
4 buying2 selling
Last quarter: 4 funds were net buyers (0 opened a brand new position + 4 added to an existing one). Only 2 were sellers (0 trimmed + 2 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~0 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 0 → 1 → 1 → 0. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
73% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 73% conviction (2yr+)
■ 27% medium
■ 0% new
8 out of 11 hedge funds have held RUMBW for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰
Value +67% but shares only +11% — price-driven
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +67%, but actual share count only changed +11%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~0 new funds/quarter
3 → 0 → 1 → 1 → 0 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 0 → 1 → 1 → 0. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 73% veterans vs 9% newcomers
■ 73% veterans
■ 18% 1-2yr
■ 9% new
Entry-cohort mix of 11 holders: 8 (73%) are 2+ year veterans, 2 entered 1–2 years ago, and 1 (9%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 2% AUM from top-100
2% from top-100 AUM funds
2 of 10 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 2% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 1.2/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.