Stock Analysis
Data Source: SEC EDGAR 13F
Updated Hourly

Madden Steven Ltd (SHOO)

295 + Investors. Track Smart Money conviction in SHOO. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Fetching live quote...
Current Price
-- USD
Analyst Target
-- (0 analysts)
Upside
0.00%
Net Flow Q/Q
↑ +19
Streak
1Q ▲
Buyers last Q
61%

Smart Money Signals — SHOO

Based on 297 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q2 · updated quarterly

📈

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row

last 6Q
For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added SHOO than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.
🏔️

At the ownership peak (100% of max)

100% of all-time peak
297 hedge funds hold SHOO right now — the highest count in 3.0 years. When ownership is this concentrated, any bad news can trigger a chain reaction: one big fund sells, others follow. This is a classic 'crowded trade' — high popularity doesn't equal safety.
📶

Steady growth — +15% more funds vs a year ago

fund count last 6Q
+38 new funds entered over the past year (+15% YoY). Gradual, steady growth in institutional ownership is generally a healthy signal — not a speculative rush, but consistent conviction.
🟢

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying

185 buying116 selling
Last quarter: 185 funds were net buyers (56 opened a brand new position + 129 added to an existing one). Only 116 were sellers (79 trimmed + 37 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️

Steady new buyers — ~56 new funds per quarter

new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 50 → 66 → 52 → 56. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years

64% conviction (2yr+) 19% medium 18% new
189 out of 297 hedge funds have held SHOO for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💰

Value +25% but shares only +2% — price-driven

Value
+24%
Shares
+2%
Last quarter: the total dollar value of institutional holdings rose +25%, but actual share count only changed +2%. The gap is explained by the stock's price rising — not new buying. Strong value growth with weak share growth means the rally is price momentum, not fresh institutional demand.
➡️

Steady discovery — ~56 new funds/quarter

53 → 50 → 66 → 52 → 56 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 50 → 66 → 52 → 56. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️

Veteran-anchored — 70% veterans vs 21% newcomers

70% veterans 9% 1-2yr 21% new
Entry-cohort mix of 306 holders: 215 (70%) are 2+ year veterans, 27 entered 1–2 years ago, and 64 (21%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
🏆

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds

60% from top-100 AUM funds
52 of 296 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in SHOO. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.
3.6
out of 10
Low Exit Risk
Exit risk score 3.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.

Methodology note: these Smart Money cards use consecutive 13F disclosure snapshots, not trade-by-trade execution data. "Buying", "selling", "new holders", and "trimmed" refer to quarter-over-quarter changes in reported holders, aggregate shares, or disclosed position values between filings. They are useful for ownership regime analysis and crowding, but they do not imply exact trade timing on the filing date.

Institutional Sentiment Summary — SHOO

In 2026 Q2, 185 hedge funds were net buyers of SHOO (56 opened a new position, 129 added to an existing one), while 116 reduced or exited (79 trimmed, 37 sold completely) — a 61% buyer ratio, indicating clear institutional accumulation. 60% of total institutional value in SHOO is held by top-100 AUM funds, reflecting elite-tier ownership quality. Net fund flow last quarter: +19 funds (more new holders than closures). Total institutional holders: 297.

Hedge Fund Ownership: SHOO

How many hedge funds hold SHOO — quarterly history vs. share price
Quarterly hedge fund ownership of SHOO vs. share price

Market Analysis: SHOO

Analyst Price Targets

Avg. Price Target
--

Analyst Recommendations

Stock Performance

Real-time

Company Profile: SHOO

-- --

Institutional ownership data sourced from SEC EDGAR Form 13F-HR filings.

Loading signal freshness…
Smart Money Signal ?
Limited Smart Money Interest

No strong consensus or elite conviction detected among institutional holders.

14 top-rated funds 1 high-conviction
Consensus
5.1
/ 10
breadth
×
Elite
1.8
/ 10
conviction
Hedge Fund Positioning: SHOO
295 + Investors

Track Smart Money conviction in SHOO. See who's accumulating, reducing, or initiating positions.

Metric All 13F Filers (2026 Q2) Prior (2026 Q1) Change
Funds Holding 295 278 6.12%
13F Shares 75M 77M -2.59%
Total Value $3.00B $2.46B 21.58%
New Positions 56 52 +4
Increased Positions 123 96 +27
Closed Positions 38 62 -24
Reduced Positions 77 94 -17
Total Calls 7 10 -30.0%
Total Puts 3 4 -25.0%
PUT/CALL Ratio 0.43 0.4 Bullish

Statistics: SHOO

View More

Valuation Measures Data as of: --

Market Cap --
Enterprise Value --
Trailing P/E --
Forward P/E --
PEG Ratio (5yr expected) --
Price/Sales (ttm) --
Price/Book (mrq) --
Enterprise Value/Revenue --
Enterprise Value/EBITDA --
Beta (5Y Monthly) --
Short Ratio (Days to Cover) --
Short % of Float --

Financial Highlights

Profitability
Profit Margin --
Return on Assets (ttm) --
Return on Equity (ttm) --
Income Statement & Cash Flow
Revenue (ttm) --
Net Income Avi to Common (ttm) --
Diluted EPS (ttm) --
Total Cash (mrq) --
Total Debt/Equity (mrq) --
Levered Free Cash Flow (ttm) --

Institutional Holders (2026 Q2)

295 + investors

Explore institutional interest and hedge fund ownership dynamics. Analyze portfolio weights, new positions, and conviction trends in SHOO. Verified SEC 13F-HR filings.

QUARTER:
Top 25 SHOO holders by conviction (% of portfolio weight) — 2026 Q2 · Source: SEC Form 13F
# Investor % of Portfolio Shares Mkt Value
1 Nixon Capital, LLC 5.87% 443,063 $18.7M
2 Neumeier Poma Investment Counsel LLC 3.42% 1,185,049 $49.9M
3 Cramer Rosenthal Mcglynn LLC 2.38% 1,115,478 $47.0M
4 Lotus Technology Management, LP 2.29% 44,340 $1.9M
5 Blue Jean Financial LLC 1.41% 48,194 $2.0M
6 J. Goldman & Co LP 1.02% 940,727 $39.6M
7 Hussman Strategic Advisors, INC. 0.81% 84,000 $3.5M
8 Punch & Associates Investment Management, INC. 0.75% 357,620 $15.1M
9 Nicholas Investment Partners, LP 0.69% 290,447 $12.2M
10 SummerHaven Investment Management, LLC 0.66% 29,190 $1.2M
11 Dean Capital Management 0.64% 41,882 $1.8M
12 Ironwood Investment Management LLC 0.61% 41,822 $1.8M
13 Leeward Investments, LLC - MA 0.55% 288,370 $12.1M
14 Deprince Race & Zollo Inc 0.42% 596,373 $25.1M
15 Scopus Asset Management, L.P. 0.35% 595,473 $25.1M
16 Systematic Financial Management LP 0.35% 417,414 $17.6M
17 Dean Investment Associates, LLC 0.32% 57,664 $2.4M
18 Blueshift Asset Management, LLC 0.30% 30,773 $1.3M
19 Hodges Capital Management Inc. 0.28% 102,050 $4.3M
20 J. Goldman & Co LP 0.26% 239,000 $10.1M
21 Legato Capital Management LLC 0.24% 69,625 $2.9M
22 iSAM Funds (UK) Ltd 0.22% 7,400 $312K
23 Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC 0.22% 432,453 $18.2M
24 Nomura Asset Management International INC. 0.17% 2,685,433 $113.1M
25 Algert Global LLC 0.12% 248,769 $10.5M
Investor Ownership
History
% of Portfolio Prev % Rank Conviction Avg Buy Price 13F Score™ 3Y / 7Y Sell Timing Shares Mkt Value Change Change % Source Quarter Filed

Frequently Asked Questions — Madden Steven Ltd (SHOO)

What does the Smart Money Trend signal show for SHOO?

Buying streak — 1 quarter in a row: For 1 consecutive quarter, more hedge funds added SHOO than sold it. That's a consistent pattern of professional buying — not a one-time trade. When institutions keep buying quarter after quarter, it usually means they see a multi-year opportunity, not just a short-term momentum flip.

What is the institutional breadth score for SHOO?

More buyers than sellers — 61% buying: Last quarter: 185 funds were net buyers (56 opened a brand new position + 129 added to an existing one). Only 116 were sellers (79 trimmed + 37 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.

What is the fund quality score for SHOO holders?

Elite ownership — 60% AUM from top-100 funds: 52 of 296 holders are among the 100 largest funds by AUM, controlling 60% of total institutional value in SHOO. When the biggest players dominate the cap table, it signifies deep institutional support — since mega-funds deploy the most rigorous due diligence and capital.

How long have hedge funds held SHOO?

64% of holders stayed for 2+ years: 189 out of 297 hedge funds have held SHOO for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.

Where does this institutional ownership data come from?

All holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings, which institutional investment managers with over $100 million in assets are required to submit quarterly. Data is parsed directly from SEC EDGAR.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Institutional holdings data is sourced from SEC Form 13F filings and reflects positions as of the filing date. Past performance of any fund or portfolio is not indicative of future results. 13Foresight is not a registered investment adviser. Always conduct your own due diligence before making investment decisions.

Full history →