Based on 46 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 3 quarters in a row
For 3 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their SUPV positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
🔻
Below peak — only 69% of 3.0Y high
69% of all-time peak
Only 46 funds hold SUPV today versus a peak of 67 funds at 2024 Q4 — just 69% of the maximum. Low institutional ownership can mean the stock is out of favor, but it also means there's a large pool of potential buyers if sentiment turns.
📉
Outflows — 28% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
18 fewer hedge funds hold SUPV compared to a year ago (-28% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 48% buying
26 buying28 selling
Last quarter: 28 funds reduced or exited vs 26 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~10 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 10 → 15 → 13 → 10. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
48% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 48% conviction (2yr+)
■ 30% medium
■ 22% new
22 out of 46 hedge funds have held SUPV for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
💎
Buying through price weakness — shares -1%, value -21%
Last quarter: funds added -1% more shares while total portfolio value only changed -21%. Institutions were buying while the price was falling — a high-conviction accumulation signal. They're deliberately loading up on the dip.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~10 new funds/quarter
17 → 10 → 15 → 13 → 10 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 10 → 15 → 13 → 10. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 68% veterans vs 14% newcomers
■ 68% veterans
■ 18% 1-2yr
■ 14% new
Entry-cohort mix of 50 holders: 34 (68%) are 2+ year veterans, 9 entered 1–2 years ago, and 7 (14%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
✅
Strong quality — 22% AUM from major funds
22% from top-100 AUM funds
11 of 46 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, accounting for 22% of total institutional value held. A meaningful share of the ownership value comes from the most well-resourced institutions.
Exit risk score 2.1/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.