Based on 36 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
➡️
No change last quarter
The number of hedge funds holding this stock didn't change last quarter. Neither a buying nor selling signal on its own — watch the next quarter for direction.
📊
High ownership — 86% of 3.0Y peak
86% of all-time peak
36 funds currently hold this stock — 86% of the 3.0-year high of 42 funds (reached 2023 Q2). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
〰️
Stable — ownership unchanged year-over-year
fund count last 6Q
The number of hedge funds holding SWAN is almost the same as a year ago (+0 funds, +0% change). No significant rush to buy or sell — institutional backing is holding steady.
🟢
More buyers than sellers — 65% buying
20 buying11 selling
Last quarter: 20 funds were net buyers (5 opened a brand new position + 15 added to an existing one). Only 11 were sellers (6 trimmed + 5 sold completely). A clear majority buying is a strong confirmation signal.
➡️
Steady new buyers — ~5 new funds per quarter
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening this position for the first time: 2 → 7 → 4 → 5. A stable flow of new institutional buyers suggests ongoing interest without signs of either acceleration or slowdown.
🔒
72% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 72% conviction (2yr+)
■ 17% medium
■ 11% new
26 out of 36 hedge funds have held SWAN for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~5 new funds/quarter
5 → 2 → 7 → 4 → 5 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 2 → 7 → 4 → 5. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 75% veterans vs 17% newcomers
■ 75% veterans
■ 8% 1-2yr
■ 17% new
Entry-cohort mix of 36 holders: 27 (75%) are 2+ year veterans, 3 entered 1–2 years ago, and 6 (17%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 1% AUM from top-100
1% from top-100 AUM funds
7 of 36 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 1% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.