Based on 64 hedge funds · latest filing: 2026 Q1 · updated quarterly
📉
Selling streak — 4 quarters in a row
For 4 consecutive quarters, more hedge funds reduced or closed their TSQ positions than added to them. Sustained institutional selling is a meaningful warning sign — these are professionals with deep research teams collectively deciding to exit.
📊
High ownership — 70% of 3.0Y peak
70% of all-time peak
64 funds currently hold this stock — 70% of the 3.0-year high of 91 funds (reached 2025 Q1). Ownership is elevated but not yet at maximum concentration. Room to grow, but watch if the trend reverses.
📉
Outflows — 30% fewer funds vs a year ago
fund count last 6Q
27 fewer hedge funds hold TSQ compared to a year ago (-30% decline). When institutions consistently reduce their exposure, it's worth exploring the underlying fundamental reasons driving them away.
🟠
More sellers than buyers — 43% buying
30 buying39 selling
Last quarter: 39 funds reduced or exited vs 30 that bought or added. When more than half of active funds are selling, it's a caution flag — especially if the stock price hasn't moved down yet.
📈
More new buyers each quarter (+7 vs last Q)
new funds entering per quarter
Funds opening a new TSQ position: 16 → 11 → 8 → 15. A growing influx of new institutional buyers means the asset is still gathering momentum — the consensus hasn't fully saturated yet.
🔒
61% of holders stayed for 2+ years
■ 61% conviction (2yr+)
■ 11% medium
■ 28% new
39 out of 64 hedge funds have held TSQ for over 2 years without selling. Long-term investors are generally harder to shake out during market stress, creating a stable ownership base that limits the risk of sudden capitulation.
➡️
Steady discovery — ~15 new funds/quarter
15 → 16 → 11 → 8 → 15 new funds/Q
New funds entering each quarter: 16 → 11 → 8 → 15. Consistent flow of new institutional buyers without clear acceleration or slowdown.
🏛️
Veteran-anchored — 62% veterans vs 30% newcomers
■ 62% veterans
■ 8% 1-2yr
■ 30% new
Entry-cohort mix of 64 holders: 40 (62%) are 2+ year veterans, 5 entered 1–2 years ago, and 19 (30%) joined within the past year. A veteran-weighted cap table skews toward institutional memory over fresh momentum.
📋
Smaller funds dominant — 18% AUM from top-100
18% from top-100 AUM funds
17 of 64 holders rank in the top 100 by AUM, but together hold only 18% of total institutional value. The stock is held primarily by smaller and mid-sized funds.
Exit risk score 2.6/10 — low institutional crowding. Ownership is below peak levels, holder base is relatively sticky, and buying momentum is positive.